回复：回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet

2024-01-25 Thread Ubisectech Sirius
>Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you >like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius >' ? Hello. Please use 'Ubisectech Sirius' to credit the report. Thanks.

Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet

2024-01-25 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Kalle Valo writes: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > >> "Ubisectech Sirius" writes: >> Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit: 8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference

Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet

2024-01-25 Thread Kalle Valo
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > "Ubisectech Sirius" writes: > >>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is >>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit: >>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at >>> ath9k_htc_tx_get_packe

Re: 回复：general protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet

2024-01-25 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
"Ubisectech Sirius" writes: >>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is >>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit: >>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at >>ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()") >>Could you please test the patch