Paulo Marques writes:
I agree with the "is like kcalloc" argument in the sense that it does an
allocation + something else. But in this case the "something else" is in
fact a string operation, so this just seem to be in the middle.
Sure, but now you're forcing all users of to depend on the slab
Pekka Enberg wrote:
At some point in time, I wrote:
kstrdup() is a special-case _memory allocator_ (not so much a string
operation) so I think it should go into mm/slab.c where we currently
have kcalloc().
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:00:17 +, Paulo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was
Pekka Enberg wrote:
At some point in time, I wrote:
kstrdup() is a special-case _memory allocator_ (not so much a string
operation) so I think it should go into mm/slab.c where we currently
have kcalloc().
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:00:17 +, Paulo Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was following
Paulo Marques writes:
I agree with the is like kcalloc argument in the sense that it does an
allocation + something else. But in this case the something else is in
fact a string operation, so this just seem to be in the middle.
Sure, but now you're forcing all users of string.h to depend on the
At some point in time, I wrote:
> > kstrdup() is a special-case _memory allocator_ (not so much a string
> > operation) so I think it should go into mm/slab.c where we currently
> > have kcalloc().
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:00:17 +, Paulo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was following
Pekka Enberg wrote:
[...]
kstrdup() is a special-case _memory allocator_ (not so much a string
operation) so I think it should go into mm/slab.c where we currently
have kcalloc().
I was following Rusty Russell's approach. Also, I believe this is more
intuitive because the standard libc strdup
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 03:28:21 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch creates the kstrdup library function so that it doesn't have to be
> reimplemented (or even EXPORT'ed) by every user that needs it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 03:28:21 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch creates the kstrdup library function so that it doesn't have to be
reimplemented (or even EXPORT'ed) by every user that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -buprN -X
Pekka Enberg wrote:
[...]
kstrdup() is a special-case _memory allocator_ (not so much a string
operation) so I think it should go into mm/slab.c where we currently
have kcalloc().
I was following Rusty Russell's approach. Also, I believe this is more
intuitive because the standard libc strdup
At some point in time, I wrote:
kstrdup() is a special-case _memory allocator_ (not so much a string
operation) so I think it should go into mm/slab.c where we currently
have kcalloc().
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:00:17 +, Paulo Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was following Rusty
This patch creates the kstrdup library function so that it doesn't have to be
reimplemented (or even EXPORT'ed) by every user that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
This patch creates the kstrdup library function so that it doesn't have to be
reimplemented (or even EXPORT'ed) by every user that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
12 matches
Mail list logo
