Re: 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks

2001-01-09 Thread Helge Hafting
Chris Evans wrote: > > Hi, > > I ran some 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks, particularly in the area of file i/o, > using bonnie++. > > The machine is a SMP 128Mb PII-350 with a udma2 drive capable of some > 20Mb/sec+. Kernels involved are 2.4.0, and the default RH7.0 kernel >

Re: 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks

2001-01-08 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Chris Evans wrote: > I did one other quick test, with disappointing results for 2.4.0. I did a > kernel build with 32Mb. > > 2.4.0 was taking about 10 mins to do the build. 2.2.x was 1min30 quicker > :( I was hoping/expecting the 2.4.0 page aging to do better, due to > keep

2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks

2001-01-08 Thread Chris Evans
Hi, I ran some 2.2 vs. 2.4 benchmarks, particularly in the area of file i/o, using bonnie++. The machine is a SMP 128Mb PII-350 with a udma2 drive capable of some 20Mb/sec+. Kernels involved are 2.4.0, and the default RH7.0 kernel (2.2.16 plus more patches than you can shake a stick at). Not