On Wed, May 16, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:56:55PM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > Could you try this patch? It applies on top of 2.2.20pre1
> >
> > It also cleans up a couple of comments
>
> That fixes it alright.
Excellent. Alan, could you
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:56:55PM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> Could you try this patch? It applies on top of 2.2.20pre1
>
> It also cleans up a couple of comments
That fixes it alright.
Shane
--
Shane Wegner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cm.nu/~shane/
PGP:
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That does indeed correct the problem. 2.2.20pre1 now works
> > > as expected.
> >
> >
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That does indeed correct the problem. 2.2.20pre1 now works
as expected.
Hmm, that uses a VIA
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:56:55PM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
Could you try this patch? It applies on top of 2.2.20pre1
It also cleans up a couple of comments
That fixes it alright.
Shane
--
Shane Wegner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cm.nu/~shane/
PGP:
On Wed, May 16, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:56:55PM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
Could you try this patch? It applies on top of 2.2.20pre1
It also cleans up a couple of comments
That fixes it alright.
Excellent. Alan, could you apply the
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That does indeed correct the problem. 2.2.20pre1 now works
> > > as expected.
> >
> >
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That does indeed correct the problem. 2.2.20pre1 now works
> > as expected.
>
> Hmm, that uses a VIA based chipset. I didn't know they did SMP yet. Does
>
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:36:49AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
> > > results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
> > > seconds I get:
> > > Stuck on TLB IPI wait
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:36:49AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
> > results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
> > seconds I get:
> > Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
> >
> > Booting vanilla 2.2.19 works fine. The machine is an
> >
> Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
> results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
> seconds I get:
> Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
>
> Booting vanilla 2.2.19 works fine. The machine is an
> Intel Pentium III 850MHZ on an Abit VP6 board. If any
> further
Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
seconds I get:
Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
Booting vanilla 2.2.19 works fine. The machine is an
Intel Pentium III 850MHZ on an Abit VP6 board. If any
further information is
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:36:49AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
seconds I get:
Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
Booting vanilla 2.2.19 works fine. The machine is an
Intel Pentium III
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:36:49AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
seconds I get:
Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That does indeed correct the problem. 2.2.20pre1 now works
as expected.
Hmm, that uses a VIA based chipset. I didn't know they did SMP yet. Does
2.4 work on
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:02:50AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001, Shane Wegner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That does indeed correct the problem. 2.2.20pre1 now works
as expected.
Hmm, that uses a VIA
Hi,
Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
seconds I get:
Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
Booting vanilla 2.2.19 works fine. The machine is an
Intel Pentium III 850MHZ on an Abit VP6 board. If any
further information is
Hi,
Just booted up 2.2.20pre1 and am getting some funny
results. The system boots but is very slow. Every few
seconds I get:
Stuck on TLB IPI wait (CPU#0)
Booting vanilla 2.2.19 works fine. The machine is an
Intel Pentium III 850MHZ on an Abit VP6 board. If any
further information is
18 matches
Mail list logo
