On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:56:33AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:29:34PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, it's NAT'ing it OK. Are you sure you have a rule like the
> > following:
> > iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> > ?
> # iptables
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 04:08:43PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > That option seems to conflict with "ipfwadm (2.0-style) support".
> > > Preferably, I'd like to stay with friendly old ipfwadm rather than
> > > switching firewallin
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 07:47:30AM +, Paul Jakma wrote:
>
> uhmm... ICQ seems to work fine through connection tracking for me, so
> is there a need for a special ip_masq_icq module?
Certain features of ICQ, which require direct client to client connections,
don't work.
Please move further
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:29:34PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Well, it's NAT'ing it OK. Are you sure you have a rule like the
> following:
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> ?
# iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables: No chain/
On 23 Jan 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
[snip]
> > -:- DCC GET request from aaronl_[[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [64.81.36.147:33989]] 150 bytes /* That's the NAT box's IP */
> > -:- DCC Unable to create connection: Connection refused
> >
> > Any idea what's wrong? I have irc-conntrack-nat compil
On 22 Jan 2001 18:01:58 -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:48:20PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Those who berated Aaron for not wanting to upgrade: he is the Debian
> > maintainer for crashme, gtk-theme-switch, koules, pngcrush, and
> > xdaliclock. By wasting his time mak
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:48:20PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> So I reimplimented 2.2-style masquerading on top of the new NAT
> infrastructure: ideally this would mean that it could use the new
> helpers, but there were some minor technical problems, and it was
> never tested.
>
> Those who be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> It was great to see that 2.4.0 reintroduced ipfwadm support! I had no
> need for ipchains and ended up using the wrapper around it that
> emulated ipfwadm. However, 2.[02].x used to have "special IP
> masquerading modules" such as ip_masq_ftp.o, ip_masq_
On 21 Jan 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
> FTP is under Connection Tracking support, FTP connection tracking. Does
> the same stuff as ip_masq_ftp. IRC is located in patch-o-matic -
> download iptables 1.2 and do a make patch-o-matic, there is also RPC and
> eggdrop support in there. I'm half in the m
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> It was great to see that 2.4.0 reintroduced ipfwadm support! I had no
> need for ipchains and ended up using the wrapper around it that
> emulated ipfwadm. However, 2.[02].x used to have "special IP
> masquerading modules" such as ip_masq_ftp.o, ip_masq
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
It was great to see that 2.4.0 reintroduced ipfwadm
support! I had no
need for ipchains and ended up using the wrapper around it that
emulated ipfwadm. However, 2.[02].x used to have "special IP
masquerading modules" such as ip_masq_ftp.o, ip_masq_quake.o, etc.
I
can't find t
Aaron Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > "I'd rather stay with my friendly old pushbike than my car!"
> > So don't complain when you can't use cruise control.
>
> ipfwadm used to support the modules. Why have the modules for i
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > That option seems to conflict with "ipfwadm (2.0-style) support".
> > Preferably, I'd like to stay with friendly old ipfwadm rather than
> > switching firewalling tools _again_.
>
> "I'd rather stay with my friendly old pushbike th
On 20 Jan 2001 15:34:03 -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:32:15AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > FTP is under Connection Tracking support, FTP connection tracking. Does
> > the same stuff as ip_masq_ftp. IRC is located in patch-o-matic -
> > download iptables 1.2 and do a ma
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:32:15AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> FTP is under Connection Tracking support, FTP connection tracking. Does
> the same stuff as ip_masq_ftp. IRC is located in patch-o-matic -
> download iptables 1.2 and do a make patch-o-matic, there is also RPC and
> eggdrop support in
FTP is under Connection Tracking support, FTP connection tracking. Does
the same stuff as ip_masq_ftp. IRC is located in patch-o-matic -
download iptables 1.2 and do a make patch-o-matic, there is also RPC and
eggdrop support in there. I'm half in the middle of porting ip_masq_icq,
but it's one hi
It was great to see that 2.4.0 reintroduced ipfwadm support! I had no
need for ipchains and ended up using the wrapper around it that
emulated ipfwadm. However, 2.[02].x used to have "special IP
masquerading modules" such as ip_masq_ftp.o, ip_masq_quake.o, etc. I
can't find these in 2.4.0. Where h
17 matches
Mail list logo
