On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Another thing I'm curious about is increasing memory pressure in
> the event of an allocation failure (retry). Why do we do that?
We were short on free memory, so kswapd should work /harder/
to keep up with the current load.
> P.S. in buffer.c, we
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
> >
> > > Tried latest patch with the same result - freeze...
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> I'm finally back from Linux Kongress and Linux Expo and
> will look at the latest
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
>
> > Tried latest patch with the same result - freeze...
>
> Ditto.
I'm finally back from Linux Kongress and Linux Expo and
will look at the latest tree and integrate the fixes I
made while on the road later
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tried latest patch with the same result - freeze...
Ditto.
> No extra patches added.
Ditto.
> running from console as root
> mmap002 from memtest-0.0.3
> with RAMSIZE defined as 90 MB (I have 96MB)
> after a while with heavy disk access (th
Hi,
Tried latest patch with the same result - freeze...
No extra patches added.
running from console as root
mmap002 from memtest-0.0.3
with RAMSIZE defined as 90 MB (I have 96MB)
after a while with heavy disk access (thrashing?) the drive
becomes silent - no more progress...
[if you can not re
5 matches
Mail list logo