Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote: > Oooh! > > I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this > problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another > board? Different vender? No recourse. Pig in a POKE, go for it. > I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have o

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote: > It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under > 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe. > > I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for > well over a year and only just now have problems :) Well let me put some auth

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Slagle
Oooh! I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another board? Different vender? I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have one since I have 1 IDE device and that. Jason --- Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA Network Administ

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Andre Hedrick
> Anyway, turn off overclokcing and try to reproduce. If this OC'ed report == /dev/null. Nobody will listen. Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http:/

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Slagle
I can try that, although it doesn't seem to hold true that 1) The load average would reflect the sluggishness I'm seeing, and 2) w and ps and that would hang but other programs would continue to run fine. I'll try to get some strace output in a w or something next time it happens. Jason --- Ja

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Roger Larsson
Jason Slagle wrote: > > Howdy! 2.4.0 is looking almost ready except 1 HY00GE problem I'm having. > > I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all > SCSI. > > System will run for a week no problems. > > Then I compile mozilla and all hell breaks loose. > > Compile wi

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
Jason Slagle wrote: > It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under > 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe. > > I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for > well over a year and only just now have problems :) It's because we've seen it a hundred zillion ti

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Slagle
It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe. I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for well over a year and only just now have problems :) Jason --- Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA Network Administrator - Toledo Internet

Re: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 07:37:36PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote: > I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all > SCSI. > > These bad? They worked well under 2.2 but who knows under 2.4 1) clock the system to specs -- overclocking could kill the stuff 2) there are batche

2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Slagle
Howdy! 2.4.0 is looking almost ready except 1 HY00GE problem I'm having. I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all SCSI. System will run for a week no problems. Then I compile mozilla and all hell breaks loose. Compile will go for a bit then it'll hang and need SA