On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
> Oooh!
>
> I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this
> problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another
> board? Different vender?
No recourse.
Pig in a POKE, go for it.
> I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
> It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
> 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
>
> I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
> well over a year and only just now have problems :)
Well let me put some
Oooh!
I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this
problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another
board? Different vender?
I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have one since I have 1 IDE device
and that.
Jason
---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network
> Anyway, turn off overclokcing and try to reproduce.
If this OC'ed report == /dev/null.
Nobody will listen.
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
I can try that, although it doesn't seem to hold true that 1) The load
average would reflect the sluggishness I'm seeing, and 2) w and ps and
that would hang but other programs would continue to run fine. I'll try
to get some strace output in a w or something next time it happens.
Jason
---
Jason Slagle wrote:
>
> Howdy! 2.4.0 is looking almost ready except 1 HY00GE problem I'm having.
>
> I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all
> SCSI.
>
> System will run for a week no problems.
>
> Then I compile mozilla and all hell breaks loose.
>
> Compile
Jason Slagle wrote:
> It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
> 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
>
> I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
> well over a year and only just now have problems :)
It's because we've seen it a hundred zillion
It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
well over a year and only just now have problems :)
Jason
---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network Administrator - Toledo
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 07:37:36PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
> I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all
> SCSI.
>
> These bad? They worked well under 2.2 but who knows under 2.4
1) clock the system to specs -- overclocking could kill the stuff
2) there are
Howdy! 2.4.0 is looking almost ready except 1 HY00GE problem I'm having.
I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all
SCSI.
System will run for a week no problems.
Then I compile mozilla and all hell breaks loose.
Compile will go for a bit then it'll hang and need
Howdy! 2.4.0 is looking almost ready except 1 HY00GE problem I'm having.
I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all
SCSI.
System will run for a week no problems.
Then I compile mozilla and all hell breaks loose.
Compile will go for a bit then it'll hang and need
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 07:37:36PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all
SCSI.
These bad? They worked well under 2.2 but who knows under 2.4
1) clock the system to specs -- overclocking could kill the stuff
2) there are batches
It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
well over a year and only just now have problems :)
Jason
---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network Administrator - Toledo
Jason Slagle wrote:
Howdy! 2.4.0 is looking almost ready except 1 HY00GE problem I'm having.
I'm SMP here 2 Celeron 300A's at 450 in an Abit BP6. 256M of RAM, all
SCSI.
System will run for a week no problems.
Then I compile mozilla and all hell breaks loose.
Compile will go for
Jason Slagle wrote:
It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
well over a year and only just now have problems :)
It's because we've seen it a hundred zillion times
I can try that, although it doesn't seem to hold true that 1) The load
average would reflect the sluggishness I'm seeing, and 2) w and ps and
that would hang but other programs would continue to run fine. I'll try
to get some strace output in a w or something next time it happens.
Jason
---
Anyway, turn off overclokcing and try to reproduce.
If this OC'ed report == /dev/null.
Nobody will listen.
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Oooh!
I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this
problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another
board? Different vender?
I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have one since I have 1 IDE device
and that.
Jason
---
Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
well over a year and only just now have problems :)
Well let me put some
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
Oooh!
I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this
problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another
board? Different vender?
No recourse.
Pig in a POKE, go for it.
I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have one
20 matches
Mail list logo
