Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Frédéric L . W . Meunier
Just FYI, when 2.2.0 was released (yes, 2.2), I moved from 2.0.36 to it on a RedHat 5.1 with all the updates and the rest built from scratch. And shutting down the system gave me the same results: / -> device or resource busy. No need to say that fsck was used. The other partitions were cleanly

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread M T
>>M T ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts >>and strange problem appears >>when shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. >>I get message that "/ >>device is busy". I've updated util-linux >>(kill,mount,umount) >>according documentation without any success. I've >>got

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
M T ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when > shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is > busy". I've updated util-linux (kill,mount,umount) according to > documentation without any success. I've got no

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Alan Cox
> >shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is > >busy". > > Known problem with Redhat 6.2 scripts. Ask Redhat for the fix. Are you sure its that. I was seeing this with one box in 2.4.0 but I don't see it in -ac. (No I dont know why either). Even better do you

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:03:06 -, "M T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when >shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is >busy". Known problem with Redhat 6.2 scripts. Ask Redhat for the fix. - To

2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread M T
I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is busy". I've updated util-linux (kill,mount,umount) according to documentation without any success. I've got no problems with 2.2.18. Any ideas?

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Bill Nottingham
M T ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is busy". I've updated util-linux (kill,mount,umount) according to documentation without any success. I've got no

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread M T
M T ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is busy". I've updated util-linux (kill,mount,umount) according documentation without any success. I've got no problems with

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Frédéric L . W . Meunier
Just FYI, when 2.2.0 was released (yes, 2.2), I moved from 2.0.36 to it on a RedHat 5.1 with all the updates and the rest built from scratch. And shutting down the system gave me the same results: / - device or resource busy. No need to say that fsck was used. The other partitions were cleanly

2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread M T
I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is busy". I've updated util-linux (kill,mount,umount) according to documentation without any success. I've got no problems with 2.2.18. Any ideas?

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:03:06 -, "M T" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running redhat 6.2 halt scripts and strange problem appears when shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is busy". Known problem with Redhat 6.2 scripts. Ask Redhat for the fix. - To

Re: 2.4.0 umount problem

2001-01-10 Thread Alan Cox
shutting system down with kernel-2.4.0. I get message that "/ device is busy". Known problem with Redhat 6.2 scripts. Ask Redhat for the fix. Are you sure its that. I was seeing this with one box in 2.4.0 but I don't see it in -ac. (No I dont know why either). Even better do you know