Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452!
> > invalid operand:
>
> Does reiserfs patch changes vmscan.c ?
>
> If so, whats in line 452 of mm/vmscan.c of 2.4.0 reiserfs tree?
reiserfs doesn't touch mm/vmscan.c.
the line is: del_page_from_inactive_clean_list(page);
-d
> -- -
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:21:57PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452!
>> invalid operand:
> Does reiserfs patch changes vmscan.c ?
No, it doesn't.
It's strange that the console reported vmscan.c:452 whilst
kern.log reports page_alloc.c:74
So long.
Ulrich
-
To u
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Ulrich Schwarz wrote:
> 2.4.0 (final i586) patched with reiserfs 3.6.25 produced the following BUG:
>
>
> the console report (ksymoopsed):
>
> kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452!
> invalid operand:
Does reiserfs patch changes vmscan.c ?
If so, whats in line 452 of mm/vmsca
2.4.0 (final i586) patched with reiserfs 3.6.25 produced the following BUG:
the console report (ksymoopsed):
kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010282
eax: 001c ebx: c101322c ecx: c0274
Hi,
2.4.0 (final i386) patched with reiserfs 3.6.25 produced the following BUG:
the console reported:
kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
EFLAGS: 00010282
eax: 001c ebx: c101322c ecx: c0274608 edx:
esi: c23acc24 edi: c1013210 ebp: 00
5 matches
Mail list logo