On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Guest section DW wrote:
> > -static inline struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(uid_t uid, unsigned int hashent)
> > +static inline struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(unsigned short uid, unsigned int
>hashent)
>
> Your labeling is confusing. linux.vanilla? linux-2.4.0-test9?
> W
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:45:46AM -0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
>
> I noticed I forgot a ; somewhere there. Here's the right patch:
>
> --- linux-2.4.0-test9/kernel/user.c Mon Oct 9 01:37:35 2000
> +++ linux.vanilla/kernel/user.c Sun Oct 8 22:33:55 2000
> @@ -51,22 +51,18 @@
> *up->pp
I noticed I forgot a ; somewhere there. Here's the right patch:
--- linux-2.4.0-test9/kernel/user.c Mon Oct 9 01:37:35 2000
+++ linux.vanilla/kernel/user.c Sun Oct 8 22:33:55 2000
@@ -51,22 +51,18 @@
*up->pprev = up->next;
}
-static inline struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(uid_t
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> Dan Aloni wrote:
> >
> > I've been touring around the kernel sources when I stumbled
> > across the uid_hash_find() function (kernel/user.c):
> >
> > static inline struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(unsigned short uid, unsigned int
>hashent)
>
> I
Dan Aloni wrote:
>
> I've been touring around the kernel sources when I stumbled
> across the uid_hash_find() function (kernel/user.c):
>
> static inline struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(unsigned short uid, unsigned int
>hashent)
Is it just me, or should that be "uid_t" not "unsigned short"?
I've been touring around the kernel sources when I stumbled
across the uid_hash_find() function (kernel/user.c):
static inline struct user_struct *uid_hash_find(unsigned short uid, unsigned int
hashent)
{
struct user_struct *up, *next;
next = uidhash[hashent];
for (;;)
6 matches
Mail list logo