Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summary Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-15 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 03:15:01PM -0500, John Jasen wrote: > > I retried the mysticism and incantations (d -l 801feac d) at the srm > prompt, and the machine locked on fsck, under kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Like I wrote - I did not get to locks on fsck but then stuff was weird and if I would press

Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summary Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-15 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:49:29PM -0500, John Jasen wrote: > > Well, the situation is improving, I suppose ... > > Under kernel 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, a dd of about 1 4k blocks would cause > the system to go technicolor and lock up. On UP1100 which I have here somehow this looks a bit different

Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summary Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-15 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:49:29PM -0500, John Jasen wrote: Well, the situation is improving, I suppose ... Under kernel 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, a dd of about 1 4k blocks would cause the system to go technicolor and lock up. On UP1100 which I have here somehow this looks a bit different

Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summary Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-15 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 03:15:01PM -0500, John Jasen wrote: I retried the mysticism and incantations (d -l 801feac d) at the srm prompt, and the machine locked on fsck, under kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Like I wrote - I did not get to locks on fsck but then stuff was weird and if I would press

Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
To follow my own message about lockups on UP1100. This time I tried to boot 2.4.1-ac1. Results are really the same but this time an attempt to copy kernel source from a partition on a SCSI drive to another one on an IDE drive brought different message. I include it below. When trying to

Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:46:12AM -0500, John Jasen wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine > > happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE > > drives hooked to a builtin "Acer

Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread John Jasen
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine > happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE > drives hooked to a builtin "Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M5229 IDE". ALI M1535D pci-ide bridge, isn't it?

Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread John Jasen
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michal Jaegermann wrote: I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE drives hooked to a builtin "Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M5229 IDE". ALI M1535D pci-ide bridge, isn't it? That's

Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:46:12AM -0500, John Jasen wrote: On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michal Jaegermann wrote: I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE drives hooked to a builtin "Acer Laboratories Inc.

Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-02-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
To follow my own message about lockups on UP1100. This time I tried to boot 2.4.1-ac1. Results are really the same but this time an attempt to copy kernel source from a partition on a SCSI drive to another one on an IDE drive brought different message. I include it below. When trying to

2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-01-31 Thread Michal Jaegermann
I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE drives hooked to a builtin "Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M5229 IDE". It boots and in the first moment makes even a pretty good impression of beeing healthy. But an

2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems

2001-01-31 Thread Michal Jaegermann
I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE drives hooked to a builtin "Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M5229 IDE". It boots and in the first moment makes even a pretty good impression of beeing healthy. But an