On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Todd M. Roy wrote:
> I tried 2.4.4 with the old aic7 driver and it worked fine.
That may be true, and it may help the deployment of 2.4.4 on that
particular machine, but the kernel needs the bugfix anyways, and
reporting the bug is the least I can do. If I'm after "old
>Thanks a lot. (Might it be a good idea to ask Linus and Alan to update the
>driver they ship in 2.4.5-pre or 2.4.4-ac, respectively?)
Alan already has integrated 6.1.11 into his kernels. 6.1.13
corects an issue with cdrecord and improves read performance on
U160 cards, so I'll ping Alan about s
On Tue, 01 May 2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> Version 6.1.13 of my aic7xxx driver is now up. I've included
> patches to 2.4.4 and 2.4.4-ac2. If this version still causes
> problems for you, please boot with "aic7xxx=verbose" and send
> me any diagnostic output the driver prints. I'll try to co
>Since the official aic7xxx site doesn't carry a patch against 2.4.4 yet
>(just 2.4.3) which has cosmetic issues when being patched, I made a
>patch against 2.4.4: I took the 2.4.3-aic7xxx-6.1.12 patch, applied to
>2.4.4, bumped the version to read -ma1 in EXTRAVERSION, and made a new
>patch again
>I guess we'll just have to wait for Justin to come out with the real patch...
It's out.
--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please rea
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:36:53AM -0400, Todd M. Roy wrote:
> I tried 2.4.4 with the old aic7 driver and it worked fine.
>
> I have no control over that stupid, stupid mime-sweeper message.
> Thats our anal-retentive network administrators work
2.4.4 with old aic7xxx still crashes my
Matthias,
I tried 2.4.4 with the old aic7 driver and it worked fine.
I have no control over that stupid, stupid mime-sweeper message.
Thats our anal-retentive network administrators work
-- todd --
--
.~. Todd Roy, Senior Database Administrator .~.
/V\ Holstein Associatio
Matthias,
I tried pretty much the same thing, and I also tried your patch.
Unhappily when I access my zip drive using the aic7xxx driver my system
becomes pretty much unresposive, just short of locking up completely.
ie at least the emergency alt-sysrq keys still work.
I guess we'll just have t
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> > Command found on device queue
> > aic7xxx_abort returns 8194
>
> I have seen blaming for this error to aic7xxx new driver prior to version
> 6.1.11. It was included in the 2.4.3-ac series, but its has not got into
> main 2.4.4 (there
.4pre8: aic7xxx showstopper bug fails to detect
sda
At 12:17 PM 4/29/01, Steve 'Denali' McKnelly wrote:
>Howdy J.A.,
>
> Let me ask a possibly stupid question... How do you tell
>what version of the Gibbs Adaptec driver you're using? Did I
>misunderstand you when yo
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Steve 'Denali' McKnelly wrote:
> Let me ask a possibly stupid question... How do you tell
> what version of the Gibbs Adaptec driver you're using? Did I
> misunderstand you when you said the 2.4.4 kernel is using 6.1.5?
> Also, did I understand you to say the 6.1.12 ve
On 04.29 Steve 'Denali' McKnelly wrote:
> Howdy J.A.,
>
> Let me ask a possibly stupid question... How do you tell
> what version of the Gibbs Adaptec driver you're using? Did I
You can look at the kernel boot messages for a line like:
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER
At 12:17 PM 4/29/01, Steve 'Denali' McKnelly wrote:
>Howdy J.A.,
>
> Let me ask a possibly stupid question... How do you tell
>what version of the Gibbs Adaptec driver you're using? Did I
>misunderstand you when you said the 2.4.4 kernel is using 6.1.5?
>Also, did I understand you to say
oblem?
Thanks,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: J . A . Magallon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 5:26 AM
To: Steve 'Denali' McKnelly
Cc: Matthias Andree; Linux-Kernel mailing list
Subject: Re: 2.4.3 2.4.4pre8: aic7xxx showstopper bug fails to detect
sda
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, poptix wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've got an "Adaptec AHA-2940UW Pro Ultra SCSI host adapter" using
> the aic7xxx driver (the new one, not the old one), and have had no
> problems, I have a zip drive on ID5, and a 12X Smart & Friendly CD-RW on
> ID6, haven't had any problems
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Royans Tharakan wrote:
> SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
> aacraid raid driver version, Apr 28 2001
> percraid device detected
> Device mapped to virtual address 0xf8806000
> percraid:0 device initialization successful
> percraid:0 AacHba_ClassDriverInit complete
> scsi0
On 04.29 Steve 'Denali' McKnelly wrote:
> Command found on device queue
> aic7xxx_abort returns 8194
>
I have seen blaming for this error to aic7xxx new driver prior to version
6.1.11. It was included in the 2.4.3-ac series, but its has not got into
main 2.4.4 (there is still 6.1.5
, April 28, 2001 1:22 PM
To: Linux-Kernel mailing list
Subject: 2.4.3 2.4.4pre8: aic7xxx showstopper bug fails to detect sda
Hi,
I have several machines here, with either onboard aic7880 or with
AHA2940 (I don't recall) sitting on the PCI bus, which share the same
problem: they fail to detect the
Kernel mailing list
Subject: 2.4.3 2.4.4pre8: aic7xxx showstopper bug fails to detect sda
Hi,
I have several machines here, with either onboard aic7880 or with
AHA2940 (I don't recall) sitting on the PCI bus, which share the same
problem: they fail to detect the first disk (Id #0). The inform
Howdy,
I've got an "Adaptec AHA-2940UW Pro Ultra SCSI host adapter" using
the aic7xxx driver (the new one, not the old one), and have had no
problems, I have a zip drive on ID5, and a 12X Smart & Friendly CD-RW on
ID6, haven't had any problems on 2.4.3-ac14, or 2.4.4, just an FYI.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:22:25PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> These have further devices (CD writer, CD-ROM drive), and these machines
> are 100% in 2.2.19. With 2.4.3 and 2.4.4-pre8, I get this problem
> (pencil & paper copy for Machine #2, DO NOT "grep"):
>
> AIC 7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HB
Hi,
I have several machines here, with either onboard aic7880 or with
AHA2940 (I don't recall) sitting on the PCI bus, which share the same
problem: they fail to detect the first disk (Id #0). The information
below is from lspci and /proc/scsi/scsi of Linux 2.2.19, in that order,
all Kernels have
22 matches
Mail list logo
