Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-20 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:20:55PM +0200, you [Willy Tarreau] wrote: > OK. And your config seems perfectly standard. > > > gcc 2.96-129: > > cat /proc/version > > Linux version 2.4.35 (root) (gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.2 > > 2.96-129.7.2)) #1 SMP Thu Aug 9 10:35:37 EEST 2007 > >

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Ville, On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:45:37PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:47:05PM +0200, you [Willy Tarreau] wrote: > > Thanks for your report. Unfortunately, I've rechecked the recent changelogs > > and see nothing related either. At least, in order to keep trace of the

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-20 Thread Ville Herva
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:47:05PM +0200, you [Willy Tarreau] wrote: > Thanks for your report. Unfortunately, I've rechecked the recent changelogs > and see nothing related either. At least, in order to keep trace of the > incident, would you please post some info about your config (CPU, RAM, > chi

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Ville, On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:33:26PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:22:56PM +0200, you [Jan Kara] wrote: > > > Sorry for the sparse details, but when you have these kind of problems on > > > live servers, you tend to forget the debuggability... > > Yes, I can unde

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-18 Thread Ville Herva
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:22:56PM +0200, you [Jan Kara] wrote: > > Sorry for the sparse details, but when you have these kind of problems on > > live servers, you tend to forget the debuggability... > Yes, I can understand that :). It's just that now it's hard to find > out what has really happe

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-18 Thread Jan Kara
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 05:12:06PM +0200, you [Jan Kara] wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > I got a bunch of these into dmesg: > > > > > > EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory > > > #323880: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, > > > name_

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-18 Thread Ville Herva
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 05:12:06PM +0200, you [Jan Kara] wrote: > Hello, > > > I got a bunch of these into dmesg: > > > > EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory > > #323880: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, > > name_len=0 > > EXT3-f

Re: 2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-18 Thread Jan Kara
Hello, > I got a bunch of these into dmesg: > > EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323880: > rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0 > EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: > rec_len

2.4.35 SMP: ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller than minimal

2007-09-18 Thread Ville Herva
Hello, I got a bunch of these into dmesg: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323880: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,2)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #323888: rec_len is smaller th