Re: 2.4.5-ac12 kernel oops

2001-06-26 Thread Colonel
>>Hmm, I would have thought that /proc was more up to date, because it >>would reflect changes. No reboot, never even considered it (I've >>rescued too many junior sysadmins that think rebooting is _the_ answer). > >/proc/ksyms is dynamic, it changes as modules are loaded and unloaded. >And ofte

Re: 2.4.5-ac12 kernel oops

2001-06-25 Thread Colonel
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote: > >On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT), >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colonel) wrote: >>ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.5-ac12. Options used >>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol partition_name , ksyms_base says >c01aad00, System.map says c014cba0. Ignoring

2.4.5-ac12 kernel oops

2001-06-25 Thread Colonel
Why the symbol mismatch? Why ignore /proc over the System.map? The system had very little running (because of prior lockups) during the morning SQL activity. About 3/4 of a megabyte was being added to the SQL databases, and that activity had been going on for 45 minutes prior to the oops. No X,