On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FWIW the documentation seems to imply that the option is necessary only
> when directly booting from SRM, i.e.. no bootloader is involved at all.
Err, well, you can't have _no_ bootloader.
> It uses the example of MILO's presence or
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails.
>
> Mine doesn't.
>
> > I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the
> > srm-as-bootloader kernel config option.
>
> That is th
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails.
Mine doesn't.
> I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the
> srm-as-bootloader kernel config option.
That is the error.
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right.
> >
> > The reason I needed that patch is
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right.
>
> The reason I needed that patch is that I was not using 2.4.5aa1 but a
> corrupted tree (
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:02:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c
> > --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001
> > +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c We
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c
> --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001
> +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Wed May 23 02:43:49 2001
> @@ -16,15 +16,18 @@
> #include
> #include
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I got exactly the above when compiling for dp264 so I sent to Linus a
> patch to fix those compile problems, now I suspect my fix broke the
> generic compile :(, I will check that.
2.4.5aa1 compiles fine, but 2.4.5 doesn't, don't
"Ingo T. Storm" wrote:
> I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection "generic" it
> fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and
> links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles
> away from here.
> ld -r -o kernel.o e
It should note, though, that -not- using CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC seems to
have a detrimental effect on my machines, in 2.4.5 vanilla.
When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails.
It probes the drives ok, on boot, but a logic hang occurs where no more
boot progress can be ma
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:20:29PM +0200, Ingo T. Storm wrote:
> sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inb':
> sys_dp264.c(.text+0x440): multiple definition of `tsunami_inb'
> core_tsunami.o(.text+0x500):core_tsunami.c: first defined here
> sys_dp264.o: In function `clipper_map_irq':
> sys_dp264.c(.te
Hi,
I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection "generic" it
fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and
links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles
away from here.
What more can I provide/do to help?
Cheers,
Ing
12 matches
Mail list logo
