Re: 2.4.6pre iptables masquerading seems to kill eth0

2001-06-25 Thread Thomas Weber
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:20:26AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > Thomas Weber wrote: > > > > I'm on 2.4.6pre3 + freeswan/ipsec on my gateway now for 5 days. > > It's an old 486/66 32MB with several isdn links, a dsl uplink (with > > iptables masquerading) behind a ne2k clone and a 3c509 to the in

Re: 2.4.6pre iptables masquerading seems to kill eth0

2001-06-22 Thread Helge Hafting
Thomas Weber wrote: > > I'm on 2.4.6pre3 + freeswan/ipsec on my gateway now for 5 days. > It's an old 486/66 32MB with several isdn links, a dsl uplink (with > iptables masquerading) behind a ne2k clone and a 3c509 to the inside network. > no problems at all with the interfaces (all compiled as m

Re: 2.4.6pre iptables masquerading seems to kill eth0

2001-06-21 Thread Thomas Weber
I'm on 2.4.6pre3 + freeswan/ipsec on my gateway now for 5 days. It's an old 486/66 32MB with several isdn links, a dsl uplink (with iptables masquerading) behind a ne2k clone and a 3c509 to the inside network. no problems at all with the interfaces (all compiled as modules). Tom In article <

2.4.6pre iptables masquerading seems to kill eth0

2001-06-21 Thread Helge Hafting
I have a home network with two machines connected with 3c905B cards. The main machine also has a isdn dialup connection. Networking works well except if I let the main machine masquerade so the other can use the internet too. I use iptables for this. It works for a day or so, then eth0 goes sil