Re: 2.6.11: iostat values broken ?

2005-03-21 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:09:42, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I just upgrades one of our newsservers from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. I > > use "iostat -k -x 2" to see live how busy the disks are. But > > I don't believe that Linux optimizes things so much th

Re: 2.6.11: iostat values broken ?

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just upgrades one of our newsservers from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. I > use "iostat -k -x 2" to see live how busy the disks are. But > I don't believe that Linux optimizes things so much that a disk > can be 1849.55% busy :) > > (you'll have to stre

Re: 2.6.11: iostat values broken, or IDE siimage driver ?

2005-03-03 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I just upgrades one of our newsservers from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. I >>use "iostat -k -x 2" to see live how busy the disks are. But >>I d

Re: 2.6.11: iostat values broken, or IDE siimage driver ?

2005-03-02 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick Lindsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mike -- where did you get your iostat from? There's a couple of different >flavors out there and it may not make a difference but just in case ... Debian, sysstat+5.0.6-4 I know about the iostat problems - there were 32/6

Re: 2.6.11: iostat values broken, or IDE siimage driver ?

2005-03-02 Thread Rick Lindsley
Mike -- where did you get your iostat from? There's a couple of different flavors out there and it may not make a difference but just in case ... Rick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at ht

Re: 2.6.11: iostat values broken, or IDE siimage driver ?

2005-03-02 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I just upgrades one of our newsservers from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. I >use "iostat -k -x 2" to see live how busy the disks are. But >I don't believe that Linux optimizes things so much that a disk >can be 1849.55% busy :) >

2.6.11: iostat values broken ?

2005-03-02 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
I just upgrades one of our newsservers from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. I use "iostat -k -x 2" to see live how busy the disks are. But I don't believe that Linux optimizes things so much that a disk can be 1849.55% busy :) (you'll have to stretch out your xterm to be able to read this): Device:rrqm/s wr