On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:03:39AM +0100, Sytse Wielinga wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:15:16AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > fuse-transfer-readdir-data-through-device.patch
> > fuse: transfer readdir data through device
> It is great that this is fixed, don't remove it, bu
> > >As I personally like for my ls to keep on working, and I assume
> > >others will, too, I would appreciate it if you could add a
> > >warning to your announcements the following one or two weeks or
> > >so, so that people can remove this patch if they don't want to
> > >update their libs.
> >
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:45:09AM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Sytse Wielinga wrote:
> >It is great that this is fixed, don't remove it, but it does require the fuse
> >libs to be updated at the same time, or opening dirs for listings will break
> >like this:
> >
> >open(".", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|
Sytse Wielinga wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:15:16AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
fuse-transfer-readdir-data-through-device.patch
fuse: transfer readdir data through device
It is great that this is fixed, don't remove it, but it does require the
fuse
libs to be updated at the same t
> > fuse-transfer-readdir-data-through-device.patch
> > fuse: transfer readdir data through device
> It is great that this is fixed, don't remove it, but it does require the fuse
> libs to be updated at the same time, or opening dirs for listings will break
> like this:
>
> open(".", O_RDONLY|O_
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:15:16AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> fuse-transfer-readdir-data-through-device.patch
> fuse: transfer readdir data through device
It is great that this is fixed, don't remove it, but it does require the fuse
libs to be updated at the same time, or opening d
6 matches
Mail list logo