Re: 2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Patrick McHardy
Jasper Spaans wrote: I'm seeing a similar problem on my machine - one that does not know what ppp is. Main suspect is the network bridging code in combination with iptables; the first lines of the message: The patch which caused this has already been reverted. # This is a BitKeeper generated diff

Re: 2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Jasper Spaans
Hoi, On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:57:56PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > -rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot: > > > > Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at > > kernel/softirq.c:140 [snip] > the problem is the PPP code (not Bluetooth btw.) like others reported so >

Re: 2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Pavel, > -rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot: > > Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 > Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [local_bh_enable+137/144] > local_bh_enable+0x89/0x90 > Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ppp_start_xmit+206/560] >

2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! -rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot: Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [local_bh_enable+137/144] local_bh_enable+0x89/0x90 Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ppp_start_xmit+206/560] ppp_start_xmit+0xce/0x230 Jan 23

2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! -rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot: Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [local_bh_enable+137/144] local_bh_enable+0x89/0x90 Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ppp_start_xmit+206/560] ppp_start_xmit+0xce/0x230 Jan 23

Re: 2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Pavel, -rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot: Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [local_bh_enable+137/144] local_bh_enable+0x89/0x90 Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ppp_start_xmit+206/560]

Re: 2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Jasper Spaans
Hoi, On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:57:56PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: -rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot: Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 [snip] the problem is the PPP code (not Bluetooth btw.) like others reported so far. I

Re: 2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable

2005-01-23 Thread Patrick McHardy
Jasper Spaans wrote: I'm seeing a similar problem on my machine - one that does not know what ppp is. Main suspect is the network bridging code in combination with iptables; the first lines of the message: The patch which caused this has already been reverted. # This is a BitKeeper generated diff