Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-26 Thread Rogério Brito
First of all, thank you very much for your reply, Jeff. On Feb 26 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > "irq XX: nobody cared" is a screaming interrupt situation, which could > have 1001 causes. Ok, I didn't know that. > Normally it's something that "pci=biosirq" or "acpi=off" will fix, but > on occasion

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rogério Brito wrote: On Feb 23 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: Does this patch do anything useful? Jeff (...) The patch you posted seems to only affect people using SATA, right? BTW, just for clarity I'm seeing the message in a PATA environment (on i386) and Brian is seeing his problem with a

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-26 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 23 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Does this patch do anything useful? > Jeff (...) The patch you posted seems to only affect people using SATA, right? BTW, just for clarity I'm seeing the message in a PATA environment (on i386) and Brian is seeing his problem with a SATA device on ppc.

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-26 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 23 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: Does this patch do anything useful? Jeff (...) The patch you posted seems to only affect people using SATA, right? BTW, just for clarity I'm seeing the message in a PATA environment (on i386) and Brian is seeing his problem with a SATA device on ppc.

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rogério Brito wrote: On Feb 23 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: Does this patch do anything useful? Jeff (...) The patch you posted seems to only affect people using SATA, right? BTW, just for clarity I'm seeing the message in a PATA environment (on i386) and Brian is seeing his problem with a

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-26 Thread Rogério Brito
First of all, thank you very much for your reply, Jeff. On Feb 26 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: irq XX: nobody cared is a screaming interrupt situation, which could have 1001 causes. Ok, I didn't know that. Normally it's something that pci=biosirq or acpi=off will fix, but on occasion the

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Kuschak
> Does this patch do anything useful? > > Jeff > Not really. It doesn't print the nobody cared message, but still hangs at boot. I'd give you a backtrace but my MAGIC_SYSRQ doesn't seem to be working right now. -Brian Linux version 2.6.11-rc4 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2)

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
BTW, please CC your replies to linux-ide@vger.kernel.org as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

[PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Does this patch do anything useful? Jeff = drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c 1.44 vs edited = --- 1.44/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c2005-02-17 19:43:51 -05:00 +++ edited/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c 2005-02-23 21:27:18 -05:00 @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static u32 sil_scr_read (struct ata_port

Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Kuschak
Retry... that patch got screwed up in the last email... -Brian __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail--- libata-core.c.orig 2005-02-23 17:41:03.831836464 -0800 +++

2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Kuschak
I see this problem with the sata_sil.c driver and SII3112 card. Others have reported seeing a similar problem: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/6/41 There seems to be a pending interrupt from the drive, but the code has already set the NIEN bit, so the ATA_IRQ_TRAP macro doesn't help (the

2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Kuschak
I see this problem with the sata_sil.c driver and SII3112 card. Others have reported seeing a similar problem: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/6/41 There seems to be a pending interrupt from the drive, but the code has already set the NIEN bit, so the ATA_IRQ_TRAP macro doesn't help (the

Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Kuschak
Retry... that patch got screwed up in the last email... -Brian __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail--- libata-core.c.orig 2005-02-23 17:41:03.831836464 -0800 +++

[PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Does this patch do anything useful? Jeff = drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c 1.44 vs edited = --- 1.44/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c2005-02-17 19:43:51 -05:00 +++ edited/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c 2005-02-23 21:27:18 -05:00 @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static u32 sil_scr_read (struct ata_port

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
BTW, please CC your replies to linux-ide@vger.kernel.org as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.11-rc4 libata-core (irq 30: nobody cared!)

2005-02-23 Thread Brian Kuschak
Does this patch do anything useful? Jeff Not really. It doesn't print the nobody cared message, but still hangs at boot. I'd give you a backtrace but my MAGIC_SYSRQ doesn't seem to be working right now. -Brian Linux version 2.6.11-rc4 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2) #28