Re: 2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-10 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:52, Lee Revell wrote: >On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:27 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote: >> Lee Revell wrote: >> > Of course all of the above settings provide flawless xrun-free >> > performance with 2.6.11-rc4 + PREEMPT_RT. >> >> The above mentioned patch will apply (and build and

Re: 2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-10 Thread Lee Revell
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:27 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > > > Of course all of the above settings provide flawless xrun-free > > performance with 2.6.11-rc4 + PREEMPT_RT. > > > > The above mentioned patch will apply (and build and run) just fine to > 2.6.11 if you fix the

Re: 2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-10 Thread Lee Revell
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:27 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote: Lee Revell wrote: Of course all of the above settings provide flawless xrun-free performance with 2.6.11-rc4 + PREEMPT_RT. The above mentioned patch will apply (and build and run) just fine to 2.6.11 if you fix the EXTRAVERSION

Re: 2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-10 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:52, Lee Revell wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:27 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote: Lee Revell wrote: Of course all of the above settings provide flawless xrun-free performance with 2.6.11-rc4 + PREEMPT_RT. The above mentioned patch will apply (and build and run) just

Re: 2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-09 Thread K.R. Foley
Lee Revell wrote: OK, I have run some simple tests with JACK, Hydrogen, and 2.6.11. 2.6.11 does not seem to be much of an improvement over 2.6.10. It may in fact be slightly worse. This was what I expected, as it appears that a number of latency fixes in the VM got preempted by the 4-level page

Re: 2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-09 Thread K.R. Foley
Lee Revell wrote: OK, I have run some simple tests with JACK, Hydrogen, and 2.6.11. 2.6.11 does not seem to be much of an improvement over 2.6.10. It may in fact be slightly worse. This was what I expected, as it appears that a number of latency fixes in the VM got preempted by the 4-level page

2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-08 Thread Lee Revell
OK, I have run some simple tests with JACK, Hydrogen, and 2.6.11. 2.6.11 does not seem to be much of an improvement over 2.6.10. It may in fact be slightly worse. This was what I expected, as it appears that a number of latency fixes in the VM got preempted by the 4-level page tables merge. At

2.6.11 low latency audio test results

2005-03-08 Thread Lee Revell
OK, I have run some simple tests with JACK, Hydrogen, and 2.6.11. 2.6.11 does not seem to be much of an improvement over 2.6.10. It may in fact be slightly worse. This was what I expected, as it appears that a number of latency fixes in the VM got preempted by the 4-level page tables merge. At