Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:50:14AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>
>>All of my technical arguments on this topic were nicely obliterated by
>>Andrew. The only real reason remaining (that I know of) is that I want
>>to first eliminate all things which are a barrier to inclusi
[ Pruned Hans&co from Cc: list]
On Tue, 22 March 2005 20:21:22 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> My plan is to send a patch to Andrew that unconditionally enables
> 4KSTACKS for shaking out the last bugs before possibly removing
> 8 kB stacks completely.
In that case you might find this output rele
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:50:14AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> All of my technical arguments on this topic were nicely obliterated by
> Andrew. The only real reason remaining (that I know of) is that I want
> to first eliminate all things which are a barrier to inclusion before
> dealing with thi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:56:05PM +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 22 March 2005 18:13:40 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > REISER4_FS is the only option with a dependency on !4KSTACKS which is
> > bad since 8 kB stacks on i386 won't stay forever.
> >
> > Could fix the problems with 4 kB stac
On Tue, 22 March 2005 19:56:05 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> stackframes for call path too long (2808):
Maybe I should change the output. "too long" simply means "user gave
a stack limit below this value". 2808 bytes is the most expensive
path for reiser4 without recursion, so my limit was 2800.
On Tue, 22 March 2005 18:13:40 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> REISER4_FS is the only option with a dependency on !4KSTACKS which is
> bad since 8 kB stacks on i386 won't stay forever.
>
> Could fix the problems with 4 kB stacks?
>
> Running
>
> make checkstacks | grep reiser4
>
> inside te k
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 18:13 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> REISER4_FS is the only option with a dependency on !4KSTACKS which is
> bad since 8 kB stacks on i386 won't stay forever.
>
> Could fix the problems with 4 kB stacks?
I'd be interested to find out what the problem is as well;
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>Hi Hans,
>
>REISER4_FS is the only option with a dependency on !4KSTACKS which is
>bad since 8 kB stacks on i386 won't stay forever.
>
>Could fix the problems with 4 kB stacks?
>
>Running
>
> make checkstacks | grep reiser4
>
>inside te kernel sources after compiling gives yo
Hi Hans,
REISER4_FS is the only option with a dependency on !4KSTACKS which is
bad since 8 kB stacks on i386 won't stay forever.
Could fix the problems with 4 kB stacks?
Running
make checkstacks | grep reiser4
inside te kernel sources after compiling gives you hints where problems
might co
9 matches
Mail list logo
