Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ingo,
I just found a __MAJOR__ bug in my code. Below is the patch that
fixes this bug, zaps the WARN_ON in check_pi_list_present, and changes
ALL_TASKS_PI to a booleon instead of just a define.
The major bug was in __down_try
Ingo,
I just found a __MAJOR__ bug in my code. Below is the patch that fixes
this bug, zaps the WARN_ON in check_pi_list_present, and changes
ALL_TASKS_PI to a booleon instead of just a define.
The major bug was in __down_trylock. See anything wrong with this
code :-) I'm surprised that this
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> I just found a __MAJOR__ bug in my code. Below is the patch that
> fixes this bug, zaps the WARN_ON in check_pi_list_present, and changes
> ALL_TASKS_PI to a booleon instead of just a define.
>
> The major bug was in __down_trylock. Se
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 12:24 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Note: I compiled this, but I haven't run it yet. I'll run it right after
> I send this note and respond how it worked.
>
I'm currently sending this message while running the kernel with this
patch. But I haven't compiled with RT_DEADL
Ingo,
Here's a patch to fix some of the problems when defining ALL_TASKS_PI.
The pi_setprio logic is currently incorrect. This should fix that. I
converted ALL_TASKS_PI to a constant number, so that it can be used in
if statements.
-- Steve
Note: I compiled this, but I haven't run it yet. I'll
No problem .. There are some other tests in there though .. I've been
using them for stress testing .. Apparently you don't need HRT on to use
them either.
Daniel
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 11:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 08:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Sorry, that's
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 08:12 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> There is already a suite HRT of tests they include a nanosleep jitter
> test with 8 or 9 other tests..
>
> find them inside the hrt-support patch at http://high-res-timer.sf.net
Wow, they are hidden nicely :-)
I was looking for a tar ball
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 08:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Sorry, that's http://high-res-timers.sf.net/
Thanks,
But I always seem to prefer to rewrite the wheel than to use one that
already exists. ;-) Probably explains why my cars are always in the
shop!
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this li
atest time over: 1997.701 usecs
> never ran under (good!)
> average time over: 1993.485 usecs
>
> On 2.6.13-rt3:
>
> # ./jitter
> starting calibrate
> finished calibrate: 2133.2960MHz 2133295991
> time slept: 0.01000 sec: 0 nsec: 1000
> max: 0.010034857
> min: 0
ept: 0.01000 sec: 0 nsec: 1000
> max: 0.011997701
> min: 0.011890522
> avg: 0.011993485
> greatest time over: 1997.701 usecs
> never ran under (good!)
> average time over: 1993.485 usecs
>
> On 2.6.13-rt3:
>
> # ./jitter
> starting calibrate
> finishe
time slept: 0.01000 sec: 0 nsec: 1000
max: 0.011997701
min: 0.011890522
avg: 0.011993485
greatest time over: 1997.701 usecs
never ran under (good!)
average time over: 1993.485 usecs
On 2.6.13-rt3:
# ./jitter
starting calibrate
finished calibrate: 2133.2960MHz 2133295991
time slept: 0.0100
11 matches
Mail list logo