On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [changed Cc list]
>
> On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > On Воскресенье 25 февраля
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[changed Cc list]
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J.
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [changed Cc list]
>
> On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > On Воскресенье 25 февраля
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[changed Cc list]
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J.
[changed Cc list]
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007
[changed Cc list]
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26,
On Monday, 26 February 2007 21:35, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > The patch looks good, but the changelog does not. First, AFAICT, the
> > x86_64 code doesn't touch anything outside the e820 map. Why do you think
> > it does?
> >
>
>
On Monday, 26 February 2007 21:35, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The patch looks good, but the changelog does not. First, AFAICT, the
x86_64 code doesn't touch anything outside the e820 map. Why do you think
it does?
the following
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, 24 February 2007
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday, 24 February 2007 10:55, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > On Вторник 13 февраля 2007, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > On Четверг 07 декабря 2006, Lebedev,
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 24 February 2007 10:55, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Вторник 13 февраля 2007, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Четверг 07 декабря 2006, Lebedev, Vladimir P wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 24 February 2007 10:55, Andrey
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 00:26, Andrey Borzenkov
On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 24 February 2007 10:55, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Вторник 13 февраля 2007, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > On Четверг 07 декабря 2006, Lebedev, Vladimir P wrote:
> > > > Please register new bug, attach acpidump and
07, 2006 10:49 PM
> > > To: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > Cc: Karasyov, Konstantin A; Andrey Borzenkov;
> > > linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Lebedev, Vladimir P
> > > Subject: Re: 2.6.19: ACPI reports AC not present after resume from STD
> > >
> > > Rafael J. Wysoc
: 2.6.19: ACPI reports AC not present after resume from STD
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday, 7 December 2006 19:57, Karasyov, Konstantin A wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this bug on my system, but the
problem
could be solved by adding
On Суббота 24 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 24 February 2007 10:55, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Вторник 13 февраля 2007, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Четверг 07 декабря 2006, Lebedev, Vladimir P wrote:
Please register new bug, attach acpidump and dmesg.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 17:35, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>> I started to notice it some
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which
gave me no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
> > present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which
> > gave me no end of troubles) to
Hi!
> I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
> present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which gave
> me no end of troubles) to STD. So I may have not seen it before.
>
> Suspend to disk while on battery. Plug in AC, resume. ACPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which gave
me no end of troubles) to STD. So I may have not seen it before.
Suspend to disk while on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which gave
me no end of troubles) to STD. So I may have not seen it before.
Suspend to disk while on
Hi!
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which gave
me no end of troubles) to STD. So I may have not seen it before.
Suspend to disk while on battery. Plug in AC, resume. ACPI continues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which
gave me no end of troubles) to STD. So
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't say exactly if this was not
present in earlier versions because recently I switched from STR (which
gave me no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 17:35, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I started to notice it some time ago; I can't
30 matches
Mail list logo
