* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > thanks, please do that. Right now i have no open boot-crash regression
> > left that i can reproduce.
>
> Possibly old news, but with 2.6.18-rt7 this user gets an Oops in
> read_hpet() if high re
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thanks, please do that. Right now i have no open boot-crash regression
> left that i can reproduce.
Possibly old news, but with 2.6.18-rt7 this user gets an Oops in
read_hpet() if high res timers are enabled.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthr
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
> > >
> > > please resend the
* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
> >
> > please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
>
> I'm working wit
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
>
> please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
I'm working with the developers of the 64Studio distro who are
attempting
* Sergio Monteiro Basto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >cd /etc/yum.repos.d
> >wget http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/rt.repo
> >yum update kernel
>
> I follow the instructions on my x86_64 with FC6, that you alrea
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> actually, it should only hit CONFIG_SPINLOCK_BKL, which is an option
> no-one should be using these days. I'll disable that option for now.
i fixed it instead - fix should show up in 2.6.19-rt1.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you look at the BKL reacquire issue I sent? Just looking over
> > the code briefly, it looks like it's still there.
>
> yeah, will do that. It's quite low-prio, evidently no-one in the past
> couple of months even attempted to build a !PREEMPT_R
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Did you look at the BKL reacquire issue I sent? Just looking over
> > > the code briefly, it looks like it's still there.
> >
> > yeah, will do that. It's quite low-prio, evidently no-one in the past
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
> >
> > please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
>
> Did you look
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>cd /etc/yum.repos.d
>wget http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/rt.repo
>yum update kernel
I follow the instructions on my x86_64 with FC6, that you already know
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419#c47),
ha
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
>
> please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
Did you look at the BKL reacquire issue I sent? Just looking over the
co
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] Should we start a known regression list?
please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 22:12 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >> -rt0 is a rebase of -rt to 2.6.19-rc6, with lots of updates and fixes
> >> included. It includes the latest -hrt-dynticks tree an
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
-rt0 is a rebase of -rt to 2.6.19-rc6, with lots of updates and fixes
included. It includes the latest -hrt-dynticks tree and more.
Does the zero carry and meaning or did you just decide start us
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -rt0 is a rebase of -rt to 2.6.19-rc6, with lots of updates and
> > fixes included. It includes the latest -hrt-dynticks tree and more.
>
> Does the zero carry and meaning or did you just decide start using
> zero instead of one?
no real meaning
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> -rt0 is a rebase of -rt to 2.6.19-rc6, with lots of updates and fixes
> included. It includes the latest -hrt-dynticks tree and more.
Does the zero carry and meaning or did you just decide start using zero
instead of one?
Daniel
-
To uns
i've released the 2.6.18-rc6-rt0 tree, which can be downloaded from the
usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
i also started an -rt YUM repository for Fedora Core 6, which can be
activated via:
cd /etc/yum.repos.d
wget http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
18 matches
Mail list logo
