Len Brown wrote:
..same problem with 2.6.20-rc3. Last worked with
2.6.19-rc6-git12, so it was 2.6.19 where it failed.
Attaching both case1 normal, case2 acpi=noirq. With acpi=noirq ethernet
doesn't get configured, route -n says it's an Unsupported operation,
ifconfig only shows for l
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 04:53:58PM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
...
> It seems >=2.6.19 and the SuSEfirewall are incompatible.
Actually, many programs could be incomapatible with
newer kernel versions, so sometimes upgrades or at
least recompilations are needed.
...
> There is still the problem whe
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:32:01PM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
If you could send full ifconfig, route -n (or ip route
if you use additional tables) and tcpdump (all packets)
>from both boxes while pinging each other and a few words
how it is conn
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:32:01PM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> >If you could send full ifconfig, route -n (or ip route
> >if you use additional tables) and tcpdump (all packets)
> >from both boxes while pinging each other and a few words
> >how it is connected (other card
> ..same problem with 2.6.20-rc3. Last worked with
> 2.6.19-rc6-git12, so it was 2.6.19 where it failed.
> Attaching both case1 normal, case2 acpi=noirq. With acpi=noirq ethernet
> doesn't get configured, route -n says it's an Unsupported operation,
> ifconfig only shows for localhost, ifconf
Apologies for the long spiel, if memory serves me correct, gzip'd
attachments are verboten.
openSUSE 10.2
Network does not get configured with "acpi=noirq" or "acpi=off".
There may be something in dmesg that allows further analysis of the
problem.
00:0a:e4:4e:a1:42 is the laptop MAC address.
00
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:41, Sid Boyce wrote:
> Same problem with 2.6.19-rc3.
Do you mean 2.6.20-rc3 still does not work?
What was the last kernel that worked properly with no cmdline parameters?
> Apologies for the long spiel, if memory serves me correct, gzip'd
> attachments are verboten.
Same problem with 2.6.19-rc3.
Apologies for the long spiel, if memory serves me correct, gzip'd
attachments are verboten.
openSUSE 10.2
Network does not get configured with "acpi=noirq" or "acpi=off".
There may be something in dmesg that allows further analysis of the
problem.
00:0a:e4:4e:a1:4
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:21:15AM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-12-2006 04:23, Sid Boyce wrote:
I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
access. Pin
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:21:15AM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-12-2006 04:23, Sid Boyce wrote:
I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
access. Pin
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:21:15AM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-12-2006 04:23, Sid Boyce wrote:
I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
access. Pin
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:21:15AM +, Sid Boyce wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >On 28-12-2006 04:23, Sid Boyce wrote:
> >>
> >>I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
> >>network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
> >>access. Pinging a
On 28-12-2006 04:23, Sid Boyce wrote:
>
>
> I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
> network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
> access. Pinging any other box, the box was responding, but no response
...
> barrabas:/usr/src/linux-2.6.20-r
I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
access. Pinging any other box, the box was responding, but no response
was received by the 64x2. I checked cables and the switch which were OK,
so I figured
14 matches
Mail list logo