Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had > > to poke SysRq-O. > > hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had > > to poke SysRq-O. > > hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change >

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had > to poke SysRq-O. hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change anything in this area (in theory). Ingo - To unsubscribe from

2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
Greetings, Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had to poke SysRq-O. [ 1103.164377] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [ 1103.171094] stopped custom tracer. [ 1103.174614] [ 1103.174618] === [ 1103.182692] [ INFO:

2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
Greetings, Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had to poke SysRq-O. [ 1103.164377] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [ 1103.171094] stopped custom tracer. [ 1103.174614] [ 1103.174618] === [ 1103.182692] [ INFO:

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had to poke SysRq-O. hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change anything in this area (in theory). Ingo - To unsubscribe from this

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had to poke SysRq-O. hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change anything in

Re: 2.6.19.1-rt14-smp circular locking dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Lockdep doesn't approve of cpufreq, and seemingly with cause... I had to poke SysRq-O. hm ... this must be an upstream problem too, right? -rt shouldnt change anything in