On 2/1/07, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 08:42 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
>
> Are you able to
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 16:43 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
> >
> > See attachment (evolution refuses to inline it).
>
> Is it repeatable? You may want to try with smaller set of
> modules... prism54 is quite
Hi!
> I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
>
> See attachment (evolution refuses to inline it).
Is it repeatable? You may want to try with smaller set of
modules... prism54 is quite unusual...
Hi!
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
See attachment (evolution refuses to inline it).
Is it repeatable? You may want to try with smaller set of
modules... prism54 is quite unusual...
Pavel
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 16:43 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
See attachment (evolution refuses to inline it).
Is it repeatable? You may want to try with smaller set of
modules... prism54 is quite unusual...
Nope,
On 2/1/07, Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 08:42 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Greetings,
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
Are you able to reproduce it
Hi.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 06:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Rebuilding this particular kernel with slab debugging would probably be
> a waste of time since stable kernels get very little runtime here, but
> I'll re-add it to my config for test kernels just in case a survivable
> event should
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 08:42 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
>
> Are you able to reproduce it reliably? Failing that, could you try
>
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
Are you able to reproduce it reliably? Failing that, could you try
enabling some the kernel configuration options that help with debugging
memory
Greetings,
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
See attachment (evolution refuses to inline it).
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0002
printing eip:
c109a7cf
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules
Greetings,
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
See attachment (evolution refuses to inline it).
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0002
printing eip:
c109a7cf
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Greetings,
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
Are you able to reproduce it reliably? Failing that, could you try
enabling some the kernel configuration options that help with debugging
memory
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 08:42 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Greetings,
I received the below upon first poke of firefox icon after a resume.
Are you able to reproduce it reliably? Failing that, could you try
enabling some
Hi.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 06:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Rebuilding this particular kernel with slab debugging would probably be
a waste of time since stable kernels get very little runtime here, but
I'll re-add it to my config for test kernels just in case a survivable
event should
14 matches
Mail list logo
