Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-27 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:58:46PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > ...is it "use after free"? > > > > > > Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? "PM: Adding info for > > > No Bus:vcs*" is not very useful. > > > > Maybe for you it isn't, but then again, you did enable > >

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > ...is it "use after free"? > > > > Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? "PM: Adding info for > > No Bus:vcs*" is not very useful. > > Maybe for you it isn't, but then again, you did enable > CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER to see that, so you will get a lot of stuff in your > logs :) I

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! ...is it use after free? Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs* is not very useful. Maybe for you it isn't, but then again, you did enable CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER to see that, so you will get a lot of stuff in your logs :) I went on to

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-27 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:58:46PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! ...is it use after free? Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs* is not very useful. Maybe for you it isn't, but then again, you did enable CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER to see

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-24 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:51:37PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > ...is it "use after free"? > > Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? "PM: Adding info for > No Bus:vcs*" is not very useful. Maybe for you it isn't, but then again, you did enable CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER to see that,

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-24 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Pavel, > ...is it "use after free"? > > Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? "PM: Adding info for > No Bus:vcs*" is not very useful. > > I have some patches in bluetooth, but nothing that should really > matter. can you try to remove the hci_usb_close() in hci_usb_disconnect(),

2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! ...is it "use after free"? Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? "PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs*" is not very useful. I have some patches in bluetooth, but nothing that should really matter. Pavel Bluetooth: L2CAP

2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! ...is it use after free? Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs* is not very useful. I have some patches in bluetooth, but nothing that should really matter. Pavel Bluetooth: L2CAP ver

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-24 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Pavel, ...is it use after free? Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs* is not very useful. I have some patches in bluetooth, but nothing that should really matter. can you try to remove the hci_usb_close() in hci_usb_disconnect(), because

Re: 2.6.20-almost-rc1: usb oops during resume

2007-02-24 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:51:37PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! ...is it use after free? Greg, could we reduce verbosity of driver model? PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcs* is not very useful. Maybe for you it isn't, but then again, you did enable CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER to see that, so you