Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:28:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, Adrian.
>>
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Update:
>
> I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:28:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> Update:
> >>>
> >>> I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
> >>>
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:28:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Adrian.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system seems to be
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:28:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Adrian.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system
Hello, Adrian.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Update:
>>>
>>> I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
>>> The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
>> Known bug, will be
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Update:
> >
> > I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
> > The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
>
> Known bug, will be fixed soon.
Is this a variation of
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
Known bug, will be fixed soon.
Is this a variation of
Subject
Hello, Adrian.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:43:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
Known bug, will be fixed soon.
Is
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Update:
>
> I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
> The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
Known bug, will be fixed soon.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
Known bug, will be fixed soon.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 12:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Update:
>
> On Thursday, 15 February 2007 00:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've
Update:
I get the same BUG with 2.6.20-git13 100% of the time during the resume.
The system seems to be fully functional nonetheless.
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 12:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Update:
On Thursday, 15 February 2007 00:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
I've got this
12 matches
Mail list logo