Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 pktcdvd: cleanup

2006-12-28 Thread Peter Osterlund
"Thomas Maier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this is a patch to cleanup some things in the pktcdvd driver for linux 2.6.20: > > - update documentation > - removed DECLARE_BUF_AS_STRING macro This part looks good. > - use clear_bdi_congested/set_bdi_congested functions directly instead of old >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 pktcdvd: cleanup

2006-12-27 Thread Phillip Susi
Please attach patches as inline text, not as a binary file, so that we can all read it. Thomas Maier wrote: Hello, this is a patch to cleanup some things in the pktcdvd driver for linux 2.6.20: - update documentation - use clear_bdi_congested/set_bdi_congested functions directly instead of ol

[PATCH 1/1] 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 pktcdvd: cleanup

2006-12-27 Thread Thomas Maier
ktcdvd-2.6.20-rc1-mm1.patch Description: Binary data

Re: bcm43xx from 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 on HPC nx6325 (x86_64)

2006-12-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Friday, 22 December 2006 18:30, Larry Finger wrote: > I'm trying to make the bcm43xx driver out of the 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 kernel work on > an HPC nx6325, with no luck, so far, although I'm using a firmware that has > been reported to work with these boxes > (

bcm43xx from 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 on HPC nx6325 (x86_64)

2006-12-22 Thread Larry Finger
I'm trying to make the bcm43xx driver out of the 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 kernel work on an HPC nx6325, with no luck, so far, although I'm using a firmware that has been reported to work with these boxes (http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_Gentoo_on_HP_Compaq_nx6325#Onboard_Wireless_.28802.11.29).

bcm43xx from 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 on HPC nx6325 (x86_64)

2006-12-21 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, I'm trying to make the bcm43xx driver out of the 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 kernel work on an HPC nx6325, with no luck, so far, although I'm using a firmware that has been reported to work with these boxes (http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_Gentoo_on_HP_Compaq_nx6325#Onboard_Wireless_.28802.11

Re: [PATCH] alsa soc wm8750 fix 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-21 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:47:44 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:20:45 +0300 > "Eugene Ilkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There was some INIT_WORK related changes, here is patch against > > wm8750 codec driver. Tested on sharp sl-

Re: [PATCH] alsa soc wm8750 fix 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:20:45 +0300 "Eugene Ilkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was some INIT_WORK related changes, here is patch against > wm8750 codec driver. Tested on sharp sl-c1000 > > > --- linux-2.6.20-rc1-mm1/sound/soc/codecs/wm8750.c2006-1

Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

2006-12-20 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:06:28 -0500 "Bob Picco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry I was looking for AIM VII and/or reaim which are multiuser loads. > The results (2.6.20-rc1-mm1) for EXTREME, SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP and > SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP+your+patch are below. Note SPARSEMEM

Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

2006-12-20 Thread Bob Picco
n usual ops. > > I attaches my easy test result with *micro* benchmark on SMP system. > I'm glad if you give me an advice about testing. Sorry I was looking for AIM VII and/or reaim which are multiuser loads. The results (2.6.20-rc1-mm1) for EXTREME, SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP and SPARSEMEM+VM

[PATCH] alsa soc wm8750 fix 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-20 Thread Eugene Ilkov
There was some INIT_WORK related changes, here is patch against wm8750 codec driver. Tested on sharp sl-c1000 --- linux-2.6.20-rc1-mm1/sound/soc/codecs/wm8750.c 2006-12-20 19:23:27.0 +0300 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc1-mm.z1/sound/soc/codecs/wm8750.c2006-12-20 19:27:28.0 +0300

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-19 Thread Luben Tuikov
--- Damien Wyart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The reiser4 failure is unexpected. Could you please see if you can > > > > capture a trace, let the people at [EMAIL PROTECTED] know? > > > > Ok, I've handwritten the messages, here they are : > > > > reiser4 panicked cowardly : reiser4[umount(2

Re: BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP (was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 22:59 -0800, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > [] rb_insert_color+0x55/0xbe > [] enqueue_hrtimer+0x10a/0x116 > [] hrtimer_start+0x78/0x93 > [] get_signal_to_deliver+0xf3/0x74e > [] do_notify_resume+0x93/0x655 > [] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1a > [] 0xb7f5f410 Not really helpful. > C

2.6.20-rc1-mm1 suspicious prececence code ( was Re: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates

2006-12-19 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:59:12 +0100, Jan Engelhardt said: > I take it that people will automatically DTRT for obscure cases like > shown before. Well, and if they don't, hopefully some reviewer catches > things like 3*i + l<<2. So I hacked up a few very ugly 'find|egrep' to look for some cases of

BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP (was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-19 Thread Tilman Schmidt
I tried kernel 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 with the "tickless" option on my P3/933 but it has now for the second time in a row caused a system freeze as soon as I left the system idle for a couple of hours. The second time I was warned and switched to a text console before I left the system, and w

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:18:12 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~shrink_all_memory-fix-lru_pages-handling mm/vmscan.c > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c~shrink_all_memory-fix-lru_pages-handling > > +++ a/mm/vmscan.c > >

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~shrink_all_memory-fix-lru_pages-handling mm/vmscan.c > --- a/mm/vmscan.c~shrink_all_memory-fix-lru_pages-handling > +++ a/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -1484,6 +1484,16 @@ static unsigned long shrink_all_zones(un > return ret; > } > > +

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 19 December 2006 00:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:38:23 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Looks like we have a problem with slab shrinking here. > > > > > > > > Could you please use gdb to check what exactly is at shrink_slab+0x9e? >

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:29:02 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:59:13 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > Got this on booting up on x86_64 test box. > Didn't happen on next boot. > > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/0x2000/3300 > > Call Trace:

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:59:13 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: Got this on booting up on x86_64 test box. Didn't happen on next boot. BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/0x2000/3300 Call Trace: [] show_trace+0x34/0x47 [] dump_stack+0x12/0x17 [] __sched_text_start+0x5d/0x7ba [] __cond

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:38:23 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looks like we have a problem with slab shrinking here. > > > > > > Could you please use gdb to check what exactly is at shrink_slab+0x9e? > > > > Sure, but not till Friday, sorry (I am away). > > I reproduce

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Nigel Cunningham
gt; > >> [ 310.030991] Shrinking memory... -<0>divide error: [#1] > > > > >> [ 310.456669] SMP > > > > >> [ 310.456814] last sysfs file: > > > > >> /devices/pci:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:08.0/eth0/statistics/collisions >

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
sysfs file: > > > >> /devices/pci:00/:00:1e.0/:02:08.0/eth0/statistics/collisions > > > >> [ 310.456919] Modules linked in: eth1394 floppy ohci1394 ide_cd > > > >> ieee1394 cdrom > > > >> [ 310.457259] CPU:0 > >

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Nigel Cunningham
in: eth1394 floppy ohci1394 ide_cd > > >> ieee1394 cdrom > > >> [ 310.457259] CPU:0 > > >> [ 310.457260] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI > > >> [ 310.457261] EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.20-rc1-mm1 #207) > > >> [ 310.457478]

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
14] last sysfs file: > >> /devices/pci:00/:00:1e.0/:02:08.0/eth0/statistics/collisions > >> [ 310.456919] Modules linked in: eth1394 floppy ohci1394 ide_cd ieee1394 > >> cdrom > >> [ 310.457259] CPU:0 > >> [ 310.457260] EIP:0060:[]

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Andrew Morton
> >> [ 310.456814] last sysfs file: > >> /devices/pci:00/:00:1e.0/:02:08.0/eth0/statistics/collisions > >> [ 310.456919] Modules linked in: eth1394 floppy ohci1394 ide_cd ieee1394 > >> cdrom > >> [ 310.457259] CPU:0 > >

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-18 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On 12/15/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +toshiba-tc86c001-ide-driver-take-2.patch Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IMO this can be merged for 2.6.20 as it is new driver (which is clean, tested and acked by Alan already) All 693 patches: hpt3xx-rework-r

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 -- WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:41 kmap_atomic()

2006-12-18 Thread Jiri Slaby
Miles Lane wrote: > On 12/18/06, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Miles Lane wrote: >> > Sorry, I am not finding who maintains highmem. Please forward. >> > >> > WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:41 kmap_atomic() >> > [] dump_trace+0x68/0x1d2 >> > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x18/0x2c >> > [

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 -- WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:41 kmap_atomic()

2006-12-18 Thread Miles Lane
On 12/18/06, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Miles Lane wrote: > Sorry, I am not finding who maintains highmem. Please forward. > > WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:41 kmap_atomic() > [] dump_trace+0x68/0x1d2 > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x18/0x2c > [] show_trace+0xf/0x11 > [] dump_stack+0

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 -- WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:41 kmap_atomic()

2006-12-18 Thread Jiri Slaby
Miles Lane wrote: > Sorry, I am not finding who maintains highmem. Please forward. > > WARNING (1) at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:41 kmap_atomic() > [] dump_trace+0x68/0x1d2 > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x18/0x2c > [] show_trace+0xf/0x11 > [] dump_stack+0x12/0x14 > [] kmap_atomic+0x6f/0x1ca > [] ntfs_end_b

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-18 Thread Damien Wyart
> > > The reiser4 failure is unexpected. Could you please see if you can > > > capture a trace, let the people at [EMAIL PROTECTED] know? > > Ok, I've handwritten the messages, here they are : > > reiser4 panicked cowardly : reiser4[umount(2451)] : commit_current_atom > > (fs/reiser4/txmngr.c:10

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Jiri Slaby
] Modules linked in: eth1394 floppy ohci1394 ide_cd ieee1394 >> cdrom >> [ 310.457259] CPU:0 >> [ 310.457260] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI >> [ 310.457261] EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.20-rc1-mm1 #207) >> [ 310.457478] EIP is at shrink_slab+0x9e/0x169

2.6.20-rc1-mm1 - TPM Follies on Dell Latitude D820

2006-12-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
(Yes, I *know* the answer is probably "Get Dell to fix the BIOS settings", but I'll need some more info on exactly what to tell them so it gets fixed right. Scenario - I recently got a Dell Latitude D820 to replace my aging C840. Am running Fedora Core Rawhide in (mostly) 64-bit mode. Folly 1: I

2.6.20-rc1-mm1 - another minor Dell Latitude D820 issue...

2006-12-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
I'd never have noticed an issue if I hadn't looked in the dmesg for something else, so it isn't a high-priority item.. I admit being fuzzy on what, if anything, even *actually* needs fixing (ISTR for some people, there was some config issue with the transparent bridges being only translucent, but

Re: [linux-pm] OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
.457259] CPU:0 > [ 310.457260] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI > [ 310.457261] EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.20-rc1-mm1 #207) > [ 310.457478] EIP is at shrink_slab+0x9e/0x169 Looks like we have a problem with slab shrinking here. Could you please use gdb to check what exactly is a

OOPS: divide error while s2dsk (2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-18 Thread Jiri Slaby
s file: /devices/pci:00/:00:1e.0/:02:08.0/eth0/statistics/collisions [ 310.456919] Modules linked in: eth1394 floppy ohci1394 ide_cd ieee1394 cdrom [ 310.457259] CPU:0 [ 310.457260] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI [ 310.457261] EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.20-rc1-mm1 #207) [ 310.

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-18 Thread Laurent Riffard
Le 17.12.2006 12:07, Damien Wyart a écrit : Also, I got panics when unmounting reiser4 filesystems with 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 but I guess this is related to your waring about reiser4 being broken in 2.6.19-mm1 (even if it is not listed in notes for 2.6.20-rc1-mm1)... I attach dmesg and config, but the

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-17 Thread Jens Axboe
On Fri, Dec 15 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:39:36 +0100 > Damien Wyart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > With this new kernel, I notice two messages I do not have with > > 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 : > > > > Dec 15 20:00:47 brouette kernel: Filesystem "sdb9": Disabling > > barriers,tr

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-17 Thread Damien Wyart
> > Also, I got panics when unmounting reiser4 filesystems with > > 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 but I guess this is related to your waring about > > reiser4 being broken in 2.6.19-mm1 (even if it is not listed in > > notes for 2.6.20-rc1-mm1)... I attach dmesg and config, but the > &

Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

2006-12-16 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:53 -0800 (PST) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > By this, we'll not access mem_section[] in usual ops. > > Why do we need mem_section? We have a page table that fulfills the same > role. > Basically, we

Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

2006-12-16 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > By this, we'll not access mem_section[] in usual ops. Why do we need mem_section? We have a page table that fulfills the same role. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT

(Cross) compiling fails on first try (was Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1)

2006-12-16 Thread Jan Dittmer
Any ideas? Happens only on some archs (not affected is alpha, i386, ia64, sparc, sparc64). Happens not with 2.6.19(.1). See http://l4x.org/k/ for more logs. 2.6.20-rc1 is also affected. # make HOSTCC=gcc-3.4 ARCH=um CROSS_COMPILE= CROSS32_COMPILE= O=/tmp/tmp.abUIc11429/out/um defconfig # make

[PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [2/2] for ia64

2006-12-16 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/ia64/Kconfig|4 arch/ia64/mm/fault.c |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: devel-2.6.20-rc1-mm1/arch/ia64/Kconfig === --- devel-2.6.20-rc1-mm1.ori

[PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [1/2] generic arch.

2006-12-16 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
m_map range. Signed-Off-By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++ mm/Kconfig |4 mm/sparse.c|7 +++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+) Index: devel-2.6.20-rc1-mm1/include/lin

[PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

2006-12-16 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
This patch implements pfn_valid() micro optimization. This uses ia64_pfn_valid() idea to check mem_map is valid or not instead of sparsemem's logic. By this, we'll not access mem_section[] in usual ops. I attaches my easy test result with *micro* benchmark on SMP system. I'm glad if you give me

Re: WARNING (1) at .../arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:49 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:25:43 +0059 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kerne

2.6.20-rc1-mm1: unused sysrq_timer_list_show()

2006-12-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:59:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.19-mm1: >... > +debugging-feature-proc-timer_list.patch > > Refreshed, refactored dynticks/hrtimer queue. >... I'd assume sysrq_timer_list_show() wasn't intended to be unused? cu Adrian -- "Is ther

Re: OOPS: deref 0x14 at pdc_port_start+0x82 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:24:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:45:55 +0059 >Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> > Temporarily at >> > >> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ >>

Re: OOPS: deref 0x14 at pdc_port_start+0x82 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Jiri Slaby
Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Applying the trivial patch below on top of 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 should Yup, Jeff fwd me this yet and it works. thanks, -- http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pub

WARNING (1) at .../arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:49 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton wrote: > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc1/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ Ok, after fixing sata_promise, I got thi

Re: OOPS: deref 0x14 at pdc_port_start+0x82 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:45:55 +0059 > Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> Temporarily at >>> >>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ >>> >>> Will appear late

Re: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
S. I'd expect that something got broken in sata, ata_piix or the block core which caused the "trial barrier write" to start failing. Various cc's hopefully added. > Also, I got panics when unmounting reiser4 filesystems with > 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 but I guess this is related

Re: OOPS: deref 0x14 at pdc_port_start+0x82 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:45:55 +0059 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ > > > > Will appear later at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kerne

OOPS: deref 0x14 at pdc_port_start+0x82 [Was: 2.6.20-rc1-mm1]

2006-12-15 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton wrote: > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc1/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ The kernel panics at boot in pdc_port_start

2.6.20-rc1-mm1

2006-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc1/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/ - Added the avr32 devel tree as git-avr32.patch (Haavard Skinnemoen) - Don't enable locking API