Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-26 Thread Andrew Clayton
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:47:25 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Subject: NFS triggers WARN_ON() in invalidate_inode_pages2_range() > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7826 > Submitter : Andrew Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-25 Thread Gerhard Dirschl
Am Mittwoch 24 Januar 2007 21:45 schrieb Peter Osterlund: > > Subject: pktcdvd fails with pata_amd > > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 > > Submitter : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Status : unknown > Does reverting this patch help? > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Peter Osterlund
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Subject: pktcdvd fails with pata_amd > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 > Submitter : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Status : unknown Does reverting this patch help? http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:57:09AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Was the removed > > setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3); > > without any effects? > > I didn't think that was ever checked in. I thought the patch was still > being discusse

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Was the removed > setCx86(CX86_CCR3, ccr3); > without any effects? I didn't think that was ever checked in. I thought the patch was still being discussed. The line missing will not as far as I can see cause any problems, it will le

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:06:31AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:47:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Subject: fix geode_configure() > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/216 > > Submitter : Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Caused-By : takada <[

Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:47:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: fix geode_configure() > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/216 > Submitter : Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : takada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > commit e4f0ae0ea63caceff37a13f281a72652b7ea

2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2)

2007-01-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering