Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-06 Thread Pekka Enberg
Frederik Deweerdt wrote: diff --git a/fs/revoke.c b/fs/revoke.c index 1f2e3ef..86a2842 100644 --- a/fs/revoke.c +++ b/fs/revoke.c @@ -597,6 +597,9 @@ static int do_revoke(struct inode *inode, struct file *to_exclude) goto retry; } + details.fset = fset; +

[-mm patch] get_unmapped_area: remove now unused ret variable (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-06 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > mm/mmap.c:1393: warning: unused variable 'ret' The get_unmapped_area-doesnt-need-hugetlbfs-hacks-anymore.patch and get_unmapped_are

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:49:55 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ MODPOST vmlinux WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'kmem_cache_create' (at offset 0x20

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:49:55 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ MODPOST vmlinux WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'kmem_cache_create' (at offset 0x20dff) and 'cache_reap

[-mm patch] get_unmapped_area: remove now unused ret variable (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-06 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ mm/mmap.c:1393: warning: unused variable 'ret' The get_unmapped_area-doesnt-need-hugetlbfs-hacks-anymore.patch and get_unmapped_area-handles

Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-06 Thread Pekka Enberg
Frederik Deweerdt wrote: diff --git a/fs/revoke.c b/fs/revoke.c index 1f2e3ef..86a2842 100644 --- a/fs/revoke.c +++ b/fs/revoke.c @@ -597,6 +597,9 @@ static int do_revoke(struct inode *inode, struct file *to_exclude) goto retry; } + details.fset = fset; +

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Simon Arlott
On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I'm currently in the middle of a bisect over the last week of commits to linus' tree, but I got the following with -mm1 that isn't showing up in the latest 2.6.21-git

Fwd: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Simon Arlott
This was only sent to me... On 06/05/07 05:30, Dan Kruchinin wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I have the following message after kernel compilation: --- ... WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from

2.6.21-mm1: DRM does kmalloc(0) sometimes?

2007-05-06 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
Is this a sign of bug? The box is functioning OK, despite WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0); - CONFIG_DRM=y CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y X.org 7.1.1 as shipped with Gentoo VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 AP [Radeon 9600]

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 06 May 2007 15:59:53 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I'm currently in the middle of a bisect over the last week of commits to linus' tree, but I

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:22:16AM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'rest_init

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Simon Arlott
On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Not sure exactly what's going on here, but it happened with a lock held on my (XFS) filesystem while compiling part of the kernel because I can't do anything with it now

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:33:48AM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I have the following message after kernel compilation: --- ... WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 06 May 2007 21:36:32 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Not sure exactly what's going on here, but it happened with a lock held on my (XFS) filesystem

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 6 May 2007 22:44:29 +0200 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:33:48AM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I have the following message after kernel compilation

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:49:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:49:55 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ MODPOST vmlinux WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Satyam Sharma
On 5/7/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2007 15:59:53 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I'm currently in the middle of a bisect over

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Simon Arlott
On 06/05/07 21:54, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2007 21:36:32 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Not sure exactly what's going on here, but it happened

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 6 May 2007 22:57:32 +0200 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:49:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:49:55 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ MODPOST

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Simon Arlott
On 06/05/07 21:08, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2007 15:59:53 +0100 Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I'm currently in the middle of a bisect over the last week

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Satyam Sharma
/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I'm currently in the middle of a bisect over the last week of commits to linus' tree, but I got the following with -mm1 that isn't showing up in the latest 2.6.21-git: [ 15.644778] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:86

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Andrew Morton
/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I'm currently in the middle of a bisect over the last week of commits to linus' tree, but I got the following with -mm1 that isn't showing up in the latest 2.6.21-git: [ 15.644778] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ MODPOST vmlinux WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'kmem_cache_create' (at offset 0x20dff) and 'cache_reap' WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text

Re: [-mm patch] get_unmapped_area: remove now unused ret variable (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ mm/mmap.c:1393: warning: unused variable 'ret' The get_unmapped_area-doesnt

RE: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-06 Thread Williams, Dan J
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 6 May 2007 22:44:29 +0200 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:33:48AM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6 .21- mm1/ I have the

[PATCH 1/3] lguest: 2.6.21-mm1 update: lguest-remove-unnecessary-gdt-load.patch

2007-05-06 Thread Rusty Russell
Andrew did a great job of merging in the PDA-percpu changes and lguest code for 2.6.21-mm1, but the load_gdt is now unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/lguest/lguest.c |4 1 file changed, 4 deletions

[PATCH 2/3] lguest: 2.6.21-mm1 update: lguest-magic-signature.patch

2007-05-06 Thread Rusty Russell
paravirt_probe() and its infrastructure proved as popular as it was pretty. In anticipation of its imminent demise, this switches lguest to use a magic string to identify a different entry point. This is not the long-term solution: that will take a new bootloader rev and will hopefully be done

[PATCH 3/3] lguest: 2.6.21-mm1 update: lguest-net-stats-inline.patch

2007-05-06 Thread Rusty Russell
Now inline net_device_stats is upstream, we can use it in the lguest net driver. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/lguest_net.c | 20 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Dan Kruchinin
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I have the following message after kernel compilation: --- ... WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'rest_init' (at offset 0x11e) and 'try_n

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
nal code _with_ the 'return 1;', and then add this patch to it. It should have pretty much the same effect as removing the 'return 1;', however calling ata_port_abort() is more in line with libata's new-style error handling. /Mikael --- linux-2.6.21-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~ 2007-05-05 22

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Simon Arlott
On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'rest_init' (at offset 0x9) and 'run_init_process' WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/built

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread John W. Linville
l.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o > > > LD [M] lib/zlib_deflate/zlib_deflate.o > > > Building modules, stage 2. >

Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:23:15AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > > > > fs/revoke.c: In funct

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Michael Buesch
On Saturday 05 May 2007 20:48:11 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:48:28 +0200 Maciej Rutecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andrew Morton pisze: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > > >

Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Pekka J Enberg
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > > fs/revoke.c: In function 'do_revoke': > fs/revoke.c:563: warning: 'details.fset' may be used uninitialized

[-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > fs/revoke.c: In function 'do_revoke': fs/revoke.c:563: warning: 'details.fset' may be used uninitialized in this function fs/rev

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:48:28 +0200 Maciej Rutecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton pisze: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > > > > > CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o > LD [M] lib/zlib

Re: [-mm patch] mutex.h bogus __must_check (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 5 May 2007 14:14:44 +0200 Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > > __must_check was adde

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:49:55 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ 'make silentoldconfig' produces: SCSI debugging host simulator (SCSI_DEBUG) [N/m/y/?] n ESP Scsi Driver Core (SCSI_ESP_CORE) [N/m/y] (NEW) ? Sorry, n

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Gabriel C
Pekka Enberg wrote: On 5/5/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Someone broke UML. I guess it is x86_64-mm-i386-verify-cpu.patch. $ make ARCH=um defconfig $ make [snip]

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Gabriel C
Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Some warnings again on i386. ... scripts/kconfig/mconf arch/i386/Kconfig drivers/macintosh/Kconfig:116:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'PMAC_APM_EMU' refers to undefined symbol

[-mm patch] mutex.h bogus __must_check (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > __must_check was added to mutex_lock_nested() which returns void. This causes the following warnings: include/linux/mutex.h:128

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Gabriel C
Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I get a lot ' warning: 'warn_unused_result' attribute ignored ' from mutex.h:128 I've uploaded full build-log , config and ver_linux there -> http://crazy.dev.frugalware.org/2.6.21-

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Pekka Enberg
On 5/5/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Someone broke UML. $ make ARCH=um defconfig $ make [snip] UPD include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h UPD include

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Maciej Rutecki
Andrew Morton pisze: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > > CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o LD [M] lib/zlib_deflate/zlib_deflate.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 791 modules ERROR: "ssb_pcihost_register"

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-05 Thread Tejun Heo
Mikael Pettersson wrote: >> I.e. no freezing of ports... > > Your patch to delete the 'return 1;' on error is correct, > and makes the code match exactly the behaviour of previous > versions of sata_promise, except for the additional error > decoding. > > ahci and sata_sil24 do the return in

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-05 Thread Tejun Heo
Mikael Pettersson wrote: I.e. no freezing of ports... Your patch to delete the 'return 1;' on error is correct, and makes the code match exactly the behaviour of previous versions of sata_promise, except for the additional error decoding. ahci and sata_sil24 do the return in this

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Maciej Rutecki
Andrew Morton pisze: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o LD [M] lib/zlib_deflate/zlib_deflate.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 791 modules ERROR: ssb_pcihost_register [drivers/net/b44.ko

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Gabriel C
Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I get a lot ' warning: 'warn_unused_result' attribute ignored ' from mutex.h:128 I've uploaded full build-log , config and ver_linux there - http://crazy.dev.frugalware.org/2.6.21-mm1

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Pekka Enberg
On 5/5/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Someone broke UML. $ make ARCH=um defconfig $ make [snip] UPD include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h UPD include/linux

[-mm patch] mutex.h bogus __must_check (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ __must_check was added to mutex_lock_nested() which returns void. This causes the following warnings: include/linux/mutex.h:128: warning

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Gabriel C
Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Some warnings again on i386. ... scripts/kconfig/mconf arch/i386/Kconfig drivers/macintosh/Kconfig:116:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'PMAC_APM_EMU' refers to undefined symbol

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Gabriel C
Pekka Enberg wrote: On 5/5/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ Someone broke UML. I guess it is x86_64-mm-i386-verify-cpu.patch. $ make ARCH=um defconfig $ make [snip] UPD include

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:49:55 PDT, Andrew Morton said: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ 'make silentoldconfig' produces: SCSI debugging host simulator (SCSI_DEBUG) [N/m/y/?] n ESP Scsi Driver Core (SCSI_ESP_CORE) [N/m/y] (NEW) ? Sorry, no help

Re: [-mm patch] mutex.h bogus __must_check (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 5 May 2007 14:14:44 +0200 Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ __must_check was added to mutex_lock_nested() which returns void

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:48:28 +0200 Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton pisze: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o LD [M] lib/zlib_deflate/zlib_deflate.o Building modules

[-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ fs/revoke.c: In function 'do_revoke': fs/revoke.c:563: warning: 'details.fset' may be used uninitialized in this function fs/revoke.c:563: warning

Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Pekka J Enberg
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ fs/revoke.c: In function 'do_revoke': fs/revoke.c:563: warning: 'details.fset' may be used uninitialized in this function fs/revoke.c:563

Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

2007-05-05 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:23:15AM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ fs/revoke.c: In function 'do_revoke': fs/revoke.c:563: warning

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Michael Buesch
On Saturday 05 May 2007 20:48:11 Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:48:28 +0200 Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton pisze: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o LD

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread John W. Linville
/2.6.21-mm1/ CC [M] lib/zlib_deflate/deflate_syms.o LD [M] lib/zlib_deflate/zlib_deflate.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 791 modules ERROR: ssb_pcihost_register [drivers/net/b44.ko] undefined! ERROR: ssb_pcihost_unregister [drivers/net/b44.ko] undefined

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Simon Arlott
On 05/05/07 09:49, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'rest_init' (at offset 0x9) and 'run_init_process' WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/built

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
as removing the 'return 1;', however calling ata_port_abort() is more in line with libata's new-style error handling. /Mikael --- linux-2.6.21-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~ 2007-05-05 22:24:41.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.21-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c 2007-05-05 22:25:21.0

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-05 Thread Dan Kruchinin
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ I have the following message after kernel compilation: --- ... WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between 'rest_init' (at offset 0x11e) and 'try_name' ... ... WARNING

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-04 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Fri, 04 May 2007 17:02:10 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens.

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Slaby
Jiri Slaby napsal(a): > Cc: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Jiri Slaby napsal(a): >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Jiri Slaby napsal(a): >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Slaby
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jiri Slaby napsal(a): > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jiri Slaby napsal(a): >> Hi, >> >> I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). >> Many processes end up in D

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Slaby
Cc: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Slaby
Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Cc: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-04 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Fri, 04 May 2007 17:02:10 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens. ...(boring stack dumps

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jiri Slaby napsal(a): > Hi, > > I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). > Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run > anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens. > > If I wait for a 20-30sec

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): > I would check the anticipatory scheduler as well, please. I don't know > what no-op would do with a workload like that, but it probably isn't very > good. > > You appear to believe that it's related to the CPU scheduler? Oh, no. I have really no idea, what may cause

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): I would check the anticipatory scheduler as well, please. I don't know what no-op would do with a workload like that, but it probably isn't very good. You appear to believe that it's related to the CPU scheduler? Oh, no. I have really no idea, what may cause this

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-05-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens. If I wait for a 20-30sec it

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:14:05 +0200 "Jiri Slaby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum > > > update). > > > Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able > > > to run > > > anything but smooth mouse moving

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 4/30/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:39:19 +0200 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). > Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:39:19 +0200 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). > Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run > anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens.

2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens. If I wait for a 20-30sec it becomes usable. This happens in 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 and also

2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens. If I wait for a 20-30sec it becomes usable. This happens in 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 and also

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:39:19 +0200 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens. If I

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 4/30/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:39:19 +0200 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run

Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:14:05 +0200 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem with higher disk loads (e.g. running git-log or yum update). Many processes end up in D state and system is unusable -- I'm not able to run anything but smooth mouse moving when this happens.

<    1   2   3