Hi,
On Saturday, 14 April 2007 00:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 April 2007 00:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
[--snip--]
> > > IMO to really fix the problem, we should let the drivers that need much
> > > memory
> > > for suspending allocate it _before_ the memory shrinker is called. F
On Saturday, 14 April 2007 01:03, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > Well, I'm not sure. First, we don't really know what the value of it
> > > > > should be
> > > > > and this alone is a good enough reason for making it tunabl
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Well, I'm not sure. First, we don't really know what the value of it
> > > > should be
> > > > and this alone is a good enough reason for making it tunable, IMHO.
> > > > Second, I
> > > > think different systems may need
On Saturday, 14 April 2007 00:45, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:40 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we
> > > > > > > had freed
> > > > > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > > > > >
>
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:40 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > > > freed
> > > > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> >
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:38 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > > > freed
> > > > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> >
Hi!
> > > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > > freed
> > > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > > >
> > > > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> > > > allocates a lot of pages in its suspend routine if DRI is enabled. I
>
Hi!
> > > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > > freed
> > > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > > >
> > > > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> > > > allocates a lot of pages in its suspend routine if DRI is enabled. I
>
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:35 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 April 2007 00:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > > freed
> > > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > > >
> > > > We have a tun
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:10 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > freed
> > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > >
> > > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> > > allocates a lot of
On Saturday, 14 April 2007 00:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had
> > > > freed
> > > > enough memory for suspending.
> > >
> > > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> > > allocates a lot of pages
Hi!
> > > Well, it looks like someone allocated about 6000 pages after we had freed
> > > enough memory for suspending.
> >
> > We have a tunable allowance in Suspend2 for this, because fglrx
> > allocates a lot of pages in its suspend routine if DRI is enabled. I
> > think some other drivers do
Hi.
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 22:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 13 April 2007 14:21, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Shrinking memory... Pages needed: 128103 normal, 0 highmem
> > > > Pages needed:
On Friday, 13 April 2007 14:21, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > Shrinking memory... Pages needed: 128103 normal, 0 highmem
> > > Pages needed: 125226 normal, 0 highmem
> > > Pages needed: -5757 normal, 0 highmem
> > > Page
Hi.
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Shrinking memory... Pages needed: 128103 normal, 0 highmem
> > Pages needed: 125226 normal, 0 highmem
> > Pages needed: -5757 normal, 0 highmem
> > Pages needed: -5757 normal, 0 highmem
> > Pages needed: -5757 normal, 0 high
On Friday, 13 April 2007 12:14, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 17:02, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > > > On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > >> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
On 4/12/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 17:02, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> >>> On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:36, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 17:02, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> >>> On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:36, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Monday, 9 April 20
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
>>> On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:36, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Monday, 9 April 2007 22:07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> I have bad news for you :(. I
On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 12:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:36, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> >>> On Monday, 9 April 2007 22:07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> I have bad news for you :(. I thought I had unpatched kernel,
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:36, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
>>> On Monday, 9 April 2007 22:07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
I have bad news for you :(. I thought I had unpatched kernel, but it
happens
in -rc6 too.
>>> I guess you mean you
On Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:36, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Monday, 9 April 2007 22:07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> >>> Thanks for testing.
> >> [...]
> >>> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> >>> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/kernel/pow
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Monday, 9 April 2007 22:07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
>>> Thanks for testing.
>> [...]
>>> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/kernel/power/swsusp.c
>>> @@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void
On Monday, 9 April 2007 22:07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > Thanks for testing.
> [...]
> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> > @@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
> > size += highmem
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> Thanks for testing.
[...]
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> @@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
> size += highmem_size;
> for_each_zone (zone)
>
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> Okay, so I think the appended patch is needed. Could you please revert the
[...]
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> ===
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21
On Tuesday, 3 April 2007 09:37, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Monday, 2 April 2007 10:24, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> swsusp: critical section:
> >> swsusp: Need to copy 131380
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Monday, 2 April 2007 10:24, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> swsusp: critical section:
>> swsusp: Need to copy 131380 pages
>> swsusp: Not enough free memory
>> Error -12
On Monday, 2 April 2007 10:24, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> >>> On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> swsusp: critical section:
> swsusp: Need to copy 131380 pages
> swsusp: Not enough free memory
> Error -12 suspending
> Enabling non-b
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
>>> On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
swsusp: critical section:
swsusp: Need to copy 131380 pages
swsusp: Not enough free memory
Error -12 suspending
Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
> As a workaround, you can try to change the init
On Sunday, 1 April 2007 20:17, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> > On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm getting this while trying to swsups the machine in -rc5, -rc4 is fine:
> >>
> >> Disabling non-boot CPUs
> >> CPU 1 is now offline
> >> SMP
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting this while trying to swsups the machine in -rc5, -rc4 is fine:
>>
>> Disabling non-boot CPUs
>> CPU 1 is now offline
>> SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
>> CPU1 is down
>> swsusp: criti
Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a):
> On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting this while trying to swsups the machine in -rc5, -rc4 is fine:
>>
>> Disabling non-boot CPUs
>> CPU 1 is now offline
>> SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
>> CPU1 is down
>> swsusp: criti
On Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting this while trying to swsups the machine in -rc5, -rc4 is fine:
>
> Disabling non-boot CPUs
> CPU 1 is now offline
> SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> CPU1 is down
> swsusp: critical section:
> swsusp: Need to copy 13
Hi,
I'm getting this while trying to swsups the machine in -rc5, -rc4 is fine:
Disabling non-boot CPUs
CPU 1 is now offline
SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
CPU1 is down
swsusp: critical section:
swsusp: Need to copy 131380 pages
swsusp: Not enough free memory
Error -12 suspending
Enabling
35 matches
Mail list logo
