On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:55:18 -0400
Joseph Fannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 15:00 -0400, Reiner Sailer wrote:
> > Joseph,
> >
> > we cannot reproduce the BUG you report. We have identified a potential
> > source (spinlock around mutex_init). I have attached a small patch
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 15:00 -0400, Reiner Sailer wrote:
> Joseph,
>
> we cannot reproduce the BUG you report. We have identified a potential
> source (spinlock around mutex_init). I have attached a small patch that
> removes this lock from the initialization of the hash table. I have
> tested t
Joseph,
we cannot reproduce the BUG you report. We have identified a potential
source (spinlock around mutex_init). I have attached a small patch that
removes this lock from the initialization of the hash table. I have
tested the patch but I cannot verify if this resolves the problem you
are
We are looking into this.
Thanks!
Reiner
--forwarded by Reiner Sailer:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:35:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc6/2.6.21-rc6-mm1/
>
I'm seeing this while booting:
ima (ima_init): No TPM chip fo
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:35:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc6/2.6.21-rc6-mm1/
>
I'm seeing this while booting:
ima (ima_init): No TPM chip found(rc = -19), activating TPM-bypass!
=
[ BUG: hel
5 matches
Mail list logo