Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:30 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 "hw csum failure" problem > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 > > Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Status : unknown > > > > This is not a "regression" it is a bug, tha

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

> Subject: 2.6.21: sky2 "hw csum failure" problem > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/28/105 > Submitter : Håkan Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : unknown > This is not a "regression" it is a bug, that has shown up for some users for quite a while, see: http://bugzilla.ke

Re: send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))

On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:34 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > clockevents_notify() is called with the power verify information for an > > offline CPU. I can handle this in the clockevents code, but I think acpi > > is the correct place. > > So the CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y case is broken, > but the C

send_IPI_mask_bitmask() (Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team))

On Saturday 28 April 2007 12:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > > Michal, thanks for stepping up ! > > > Subject: 2.6.21 - BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/s

Re: [stable] 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:21:54PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Also, assignation of ttyUSB#'s is volatile depending on phase of the > >> moon when booted. > > > > That's always been the case, ever since the 2.2 kernel releases. Please > > use udev i

Re: [stable] 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also, assignation of ttyUSB#'s is volatile depending on phase of the >> moon when booted. > > That's always been the case, ever since the 2.2 kernel releases. Please > use udev if you want persistent device names for your tty USB devices. I don't know how u

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 20:10 +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > >> Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > >> Submitter : Thomas Meyer

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

El Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:03:07 +0200, Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an > userspace only problem and is not related to any kernel driver: > amarok and/or audacious seems to repeatedly read/write to the X socket: OK - I adde

Re: [stable] 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:52:19PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > > > >Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > >http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regres

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 >> Submitter : Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Status : Unknow >> > > Michal, > >

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

Michal Piotrowski schrieb: > Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > Submitter : Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : Unknow > > Please remove this from the regression list. This seems to be an userspace only probl

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >Hi Gene, > >On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. >> > >> >Feel free to add new regressi

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

Hi Gene, On 28/04/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >Hi all, > >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > >Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. >http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > I w

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Subject: Bad interaction between dynticks and amarok? > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/26/307 > Submitter : Thomas Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : Unknow Michal, I don't think this is a regression. What Thomas w

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 18:27 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Michal, thanks for stepping up ! > Subject: 2.6.21 - BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/smp.c:177 > send_IPI_mask_bitmask() > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/

Re: 2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

On Saturday 28 April 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >Hi all, > >Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. > >Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. >http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > I went here, but without a login the page is immutable Therefore I'

2.6.21 known regressions (v2) (for -stable team)

Hi all, Here is a list of known regressions reported after 2.6.21 release. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Subject: kernel crash at boot with maxcpus=1 on quad core kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1023 Refere