Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 21:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 24 May 2007 07:20, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. W

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 24 May 2007 07:20, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Ray Lee
On 5/24/07, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:01 +0200, Antonino Ingargiola wrote: > 2007/5/23, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [cut] > > Uf, I will try to find the time. I am on my way to try to compile > > 2.6.21.2 now. Problem is that a kernel compile

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:01 +0200, Antonino Ingargiola wrote: > Hi, > > 2007/5/23, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [cut] > > Uf, I will try to find the time. I am on my way to try to compile > > 2.6.21.2 now. Problem is that a kernel compile "the ubuntu way" last > > hours here. If there i

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Paolo Ornati
On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:01:21 +0200 "Antonino Ingargiola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is not the ubuntu or debian way to take hours to compile. Is that you > have to trim the config and enable the only modules you need for your > hardware, then a rebuild cycle could last 10-15 min. Even 3-5 min i

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Antonino Ingargiola
Hi, 2007/5/23, Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [cut] Uf, I will try to find the time. I am on my way to try to compile 2.6.21.2 now. Problem is that a kernel compile "the ubuntu way" last hours here. If there is an expert on make-kpkg here, I could use some advise. I'd prefer to test patch

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-23 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:25, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:25, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/38 > > > > Please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=845

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-23 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:25, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/38 > > Please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8456 > That seems to resemble the symptoms you describe. > No, I don't t

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:25, Romano Giannetti wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to upgrade from my ubuntu kernel 2.6.17.3 to 2.6.21.1 and I > have quite a bunch of problems with suspend/resume, both to disk and to > ram. I have reported the s2ram problem in a separate message (search for > a

2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-23 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I am trying to upgrade from my ubuntu kernel 2.6.17.3 to 2.6.21.1 and I have quite a bunch of problems with suspend/resume, both to disk and to ram. I have reported the s2ram problem in a separate message (search for a follow-up to the thread with subject "[patch 00/69] -stable review". http: