On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 16:36:10 +0200, Philippe Elie wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 at 20:05 +, Sami Farin wrote:
>
> > > x86_64 SMP kernel v2.6.22.6 (not using callgraph).
> > > sometimes oprofile works for a longer time... but not this time.
> > >
> > > 2007-09-22 13:53:32.52723 <1>[ 337
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 at 20:05 +, Sami Farin wrote:
> > x86_64 SMP kernel v2.6.22.6 (not using callgraph).
> > sometimes oprofile works for a longer time... but not this time.
> >
> > 2007-09-22 13:53:32.52723 <1>[ 3372.390188] Unable to handle kernel
> > NULL pointer dereference at 00
* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007-09-22 13:53:32.527330808 <4>[ 3372.390363] Pid: 7, comm:
> > events/0 Not tainted 2.6.22.6-cfs-v20.5-64-2 #7
^^^
>
> Can you reproduce it with a non tainted kernel without any patches
> like CFS applied?
the kernel is not t
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:29:18 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Sami Farin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Can you reproduce it with a non tainted kernel without any patches like CFS
> applied?
I tried without CFS and it Oopsed just as nicely,
the only difference was that in call trace before
:opr
Sami Farin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> x86_64 SMP kernel v2.6.22.6 (not using callgraph).
> sometimes oprofile works for a longer time... but not this time.
>
> 2007-09-22 13:53:32.52723 <1>[ 3372.390188] Unable to handle kernel NULL
> pointer dereference at 0650 RIP:
> 2007-0
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 14:23:35 +0300, Sami Farin wrote:
> x86_64 SMP kernel v2.6.22.6 (not using callgraph).
> sometimes oprofile works for a longer time... but not this time.
>
> 2007-09-22 13:53:32.52723 <1>[ 3372.390188] Unable to handle kernel NULL
> pointer dereference at 0
x86_64 SMP kernel v2.6.22.6 (not using callgraph).
sometimes oprofile works for a longer time... but not this time.
2007-09-22 13:53:32.52723 <1>[ 3372.390188] Unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer dereference at 0650 RIP:
2007-09-22 13:53:32.527245948 <1>[ 3372.390195] []
_spin
7 matches
Mail list logo