On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:12:38 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After the bisecting, i found that the patch git-net.patch is the cause for
> the link failure.
The actual cause is my patch to mark some things in head_64.S as
init_refok. I have a test patch which I will tidy up
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:48:48 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the
>>> lpar,
>>> which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkm
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:48:48 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the lpar,
>> which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/2) is still
>> seen in 2.6.
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:48:48 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the lpar,
> which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/2) is still
> seen in 2.6.23-mm1, the link failure is
>
Hi Andrew,
The link failure while compiling the kernel with allyesconfig over the lpar,
which was seen in 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/2) is still
seen in 2.6.23-mm1, the link failure is
ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o(.text+0x80c8): sibling call optimization to
`.text.init
5 matches
Mail list logo
