On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:59:23AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
...
> > > How about cc:ing the netpoll maintainer?
> >
> > Is there a new one or do you suggest
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:59:23AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
...
How about cc:ing the netpoll maintainer?
Is there a new one or do you suggest possibility of
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:07:38 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, I don't have any idea of what is a "reasonable amount".
> Guess I could look at non-movable zone memory usage in a system at
> typical or peak load to get an idea. Anyone have any data in this
> regard?
>
On (02/08/07 17:14), Mel Gorman didst pronounce:
> On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > > when ZONE_MOVABLE is
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
> >
>
> It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:44 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
> >
>
> It's case-by-case I think. In zone order
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:26:12PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
...
> Whoops, I only said that in humour, probably should've snuck in a
> smiley or two. Definitely not blaming anybody. Apologies to anyone
> who felt offended, sorry, nothing such was intended, I assure.
I see you probably didn't
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> [...]
> How often "common" developer has to make such decisions in Kconfig?
> Probably no more than once per year. So, it's fair to blame anybody
> for not reading lkml to find if there
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > endif # NETDEVICES
> > > >
> > > > config NETPOLL
> > > > depends on NETDEVICES
> > > > def_bool NETCONSOLE
> > > >
> > > > config
pends on NETPOLL
> > > >
> > > > config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> > > > def_bool NETPOLL
> > > > depends on NETPOLL
Gargh, what we're seeing here is a whole bunch of bugs, I think. First
I thought this must be one of those randconfig
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > endif # NETDEVICES
> > >
> > > config NETPOLL
> > > depends on NETDEVICES
> > > def_bool NETCONSOLE
> > >
> > > config NETPOLL_TRAP
> > > bool "Netpoll traffic trapping"
> > > default n
> > >
> >
> > ...
> > endif # NETDEVICES
> >
> > config NETPOLL
> > depends on NETDEVICES
> > def_bool NETCONSOLE
> >
> > config NETPOLL_TRAP
> > bool "Netpoll traffic trapping"
> > default n
> > depends on NETPOLL
> >
> > config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > >>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config NETPOLL_TRAP
bool Netpoll traffic trapping
default n
depends on NETPOLL
config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
def_bool NETPOLL
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config NETPOLL_TRAP
bool Netpoll traffic trapping
default n
depends on NETPOLL
config
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
endif # NETDEVICES
config NETPOLL
depends on NETDEVICES
def_bool NETCONSOLE
config NETPOLL_TRAP
bool Netpoll
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
[...]
How often common developer has to make such decisions in Kconfig?
Probably no more than once per year. So, it's fair to blame anybody
for not reading lkml to find if there are
of those randconfig-producing-wrong-configs
issues, but surprisingly, running make oldconfig on this .config on
a fresh 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 tree didn't change anything in the .config.
Kconfig bug #1:
===
Which means, although:
*
menuconfig BAZ
if BAZ
config BAR
endif
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:26:12PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
...
Whoops, I only said that in humour, probably should've snuck in a
smiley or two. Definitely not blaming anybody. Apologies to anyone
who felt offended, sorry, nothing such was intended, I assure.
I see you probably didn't
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:44 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE
On (02/08/07 17:14), Mel Gorman didst pronounce:
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue,
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:07:38 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, I don't have any idea of what is a reasonable amount.
Guess I could look at non-movable zone memory usage in a system at
typical or peak load to get an idea. Anyone have any data in this
regard?
I'm
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > >> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> >
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
>
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case,
user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until
Fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl config
Against 2.6.23-rc1-mm1.
Found this testing Mel Gorman's patch for the issue with
"policy_zone" and ZONE_MOVABLE.
Misplaced #endif is hiding the numa_zonelist_order sysctl
when !SECURITY.
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
Looks like -rc1-mm2 came out while I was hunting this, haven't tried that yet)
File-backed loopback seems to be broken (note that I use a LVM vol
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> >> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
Looks like -rc1-mm2 came out while I was hunting this, haven't tried that yet)
File-backed loopback seems to be broken (note that I use a LVM volume
Fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl config
Against 2.6.23-rc1-mm1.
Found this testing Mel Gorman's patch for the issue with
policy_zone and ZONE_MOVABLE.
Misplaced #endif is hiding the numa_zonelist_order sysctl
when !SECURITY.
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case,
user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 03:31:43 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
> > So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
> > TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
> > all the *possible* TPM
base netconsole usb_storage usbhid
hid libusual snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss sg ipv6 evdev snd_intel8x0
snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus psmouse snd_pcm ehci_hcd snd_timer serio_raw ohci_hcd
snd snd_page_alloc usbcore
Pid: 7793, comm: gnome-volume-ma Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #1
RIP:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
> So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
> TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
> all the *possible* TPM configurations. I would guess that none of them
> shows an IRQ either.
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 12:48:29 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Scratch that. When I wrote the first note, I was at home, and the TPM chip
> did its PNP thing and became 00:0e. I failed to notice that in my reply,
> I was at work, and the printer port on the docking station became 00:0e and
> the
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:53:19 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > Just for the record, I see this in /sys:
> > >
> > > % cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/id
> > > BCM0102
> > > PNP0c31
> >
> > What's in /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources?
>
> % cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources
> state =
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got this
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:44:52AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
...
> kgdboe is completely useless without a network card that has a polling
> driver. It seems to me that the simple and easy fix is to set it to
> depend on NETDEVICES but allow it to use select on NETPOLL.
Maybe I miss your point
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> I got this compile error with a
Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got this compile error with a randconfig (
>>> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:44:52AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
...
kgdboe is completely useless without a network card that has a polling
driver. It seems to me that the simple and easy fix is to set it to
depend on NETDEVICES but allow it to use select on NETPOLL.
Maybe I miss your point
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:53:19 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just for the record, I see this in /sys:
% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/id
BCM0102
PNP0c31
What's in /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources?
% cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources
state = active
io 0x378-0x37f
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 12:48:29 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scratch that. When I wrote the first note, I was at home, and the TPM chip
did its PNP thing and became 00:0e. I failed to notice that in my reply,
I was at work, and the printer port on the docking station became 00:0e and
the TPM
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
all the *possible* TPM configurations. I would guess that none of them
shows an IRQ either.
snd_page_alloc usbcore
Pid: 7793, comm: gnome-volume-ma Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #1
RIP: 0010:[803356e5] [803356e5]
count_deleted_blocks_actor+0x5/0x20
RSP: 0018:8100150b9ca0 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0d1ccea0 RBX: 00d1ccea RCX: 8100150b9d10
RDX
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 03:31:43 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the
TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have
all the *possible* TPM
>On 7/30/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
> > > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:43:13 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
> I don't know why tpm_tis_init() is messing around trying different
> IRQs between 3 and 16. That looks suspiciously x86-dependent.
>
> Maybe if you don't have PNP (though I doubt TPMs exist on any
> pre-PNPBIOS machines) the "check-IRQ"
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
> > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
> > stack (we do that in
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
> unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
> stack (we do that in various places), but that sucks.
>
> Christoph, have you any
[ 85.718117] CPU 1
> > [ 85.720159] Modules linked in:
> > [ 85.723242] Pid: 3976, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #4
> > [ 85.729247] RIP: 0010:[] []
> > lo_ioctl+0x25/0xaa0
> > [ 85.737011] RSP: 0018:8100076a3708 EFLAGS: 00010282
> > [ 85
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:43:13 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here:
> >
> > for (i = 3; i < 16 && chip->vendor.irq == 0; i++) {
> >
[mm] Error 2
>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> guessing while this patch , but I am not really sure :
>>
>> fix-corruption-of-memmap-on-ia64-sparsemem-when-mem_section-is-not-a-power-of-2.patch
>>
>
> That seems to
100 RIP:
> [ 85.702528] [] lo_ioctl+0x25/0xaa0
> [ 85.710066] PGD 73fd067 PUD 735b067 PMD 0
> [ 85.714221] Oops: [1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 85.718117] CPU 1
> [ 85.720159] Modules linked in:
> [ 85.723242] Pid: 3976, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #4
> [ 85.72
] lo_ioctl+0x25/0xaa0
[ 85.710066] PGD 73fd067 PUD 735b067 PMD 0
[ 85.714221] Oops: [1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 85.718117] CPU 1
[ 85.720159] Modules linked in:
[ 85.723242] Pid: 3976, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #4
[ 85.729247] RIP: 0010:[80477885] [80477885
-of-memmap-on-ia64-sparsemem-when-mem_section-is-not-a-power-of-2.patch
That seems to have been fixed by one of the post-2.6.23-rc1-mm1 patches I
merged,
thanks.
I believe that this was fixed by a patch from Mel Gorman which I believe
merged into -mm as:
fix-corruption-of-memmap-on-ia64-sparsemem
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:43:13 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here:
for (i = 3; i 16 chip-vendor.irq == 0; i++) {
Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #4
[ 85.729247] RIP: 0010:[80477885] [80477885]
lo_ioctl+0x25/0xaa0
[ 85.737011] RSP: 0018:8100076a3708 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 85.742326] RAX: 80477860 RBX: fdfd RCX:
5310
[ 85.749459] RDX: 8100076a3b58
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
stack (we do that in various places), but that sucks.
Christoph, have you any
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the
stack (we do that in various
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:43:13 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said:
I don't know why tpm_tis_init() is messing around trying different
IRQs between 3 and 16. That looks suspiciously x86-dependent.
Maybe if you don't have PNP (though I doubt TPMs exist on any
pre-PNPBIOS machines) the check-IRQ loop
On 7/30/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes
unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a
On 7/28/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [] proc_cpuset_show+0x5e/0xb9
> > [] seq_read+0xef/0x266
> > [] vfs_read+0x8e/0x117
> > [] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
> > [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
> > ===
> > INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> > Code: 00 89 d8 83 c4 0c
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
>
Hi,
I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
If I revert the
ice_sleep_state'
This patch should fix it :
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/hot-fixes/acpi-revert-d-states-branch-from-jun-17-to-jun-19-for-2623-rc1-mm1.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
.
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1
# Sun Jul 29 09:14:48 2007
#
CONFIG_X86_64=y
CONFIG_64BIT=y
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32=y
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y
Hello,
iMac G3 series.
$ make mrproper && make allmodconfig && make
results in this:
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s
AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o
lparmap.c: Assembler messages:
lparmap.c:84: Error: file number 1 already allocated
make[1]: ***
Hello,
iMac G3 series.
$ make mrproper make allmodconfig make
results in this:
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s
AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o
lparmap.c: Assembler messages:
lparmap.c:84: Error: file number 1 already allocated
make[1]: ***
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/
Hi,
I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device.
If I revert the patch 'loop-use
.
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1
# Sun Jul 29 09:14:48 2007
#
CONFIG_X86_64=y
CONFIG_64BIT=y
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32=y
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y
'
This patch should fix it :
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/hot-fixes/acpi-revert-d-states-branch-from-jun-17-to-jun-19-for-2623-rc1-mm1.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On 7/28/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[c0154ad2] proc_cpuset_show+0x5e/0xb9
[c01976b1] seq_read+0xef/0x266
[c0181398] vfs_read+0x8e/0x117
[c01817c9] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
[c010401e] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
===
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got this compile error with a randconfig (
>> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
>>
>> ...
>>
>> net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
>>
t; guessing while this patch , but I am not really sure :
>
> fix-corruption-of-memmap-on-ia64-sparsemem-when-mem_section-is-not-a-power-of-2.patch
>
That seems to have been fixed by one of the post-2.6.23-rc1-mm1 patches I
merged,
thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &q
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got this compile error with a randconfig (
> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
>
> ...
>
> net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
> net/core/netpoll.c:155: error:
Hi,
next randconfig error (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error )
...
mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
'sparse_early_usemap_alloc'
mm/sparse.c:482: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without
...
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:86: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_status' declared
'static' but never defined
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:87: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_iec958' declared
'static' but never defined
...
Got that with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat
Hi,
I got this error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat )
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ioat_shutdown_functionality':
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed32): undefined reference to `unregister_dca_provider'
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed3a): undefined
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named
'poll_controller'
net/core/netpoll.c:159: error: 'struct
283
> [ 36.940581] Detected 12.500 MHz APIC timer.
>
> So I think, I will postpone SPARSEMEM until -mm2, as there are seem to
> be some problems in that area (Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp
> fix)
>
> But maybee I will get SLUB to work. ;)
SLUB works, if I rebo
ot;[a-g]*" | xargs file
>
> dmesg shows:
I'm unable to reproduce this.
> process `cat' is using deprecated sysctl (syscall)
> net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time; Use
> net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time_ms instead.
>
> ==========
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x183): Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.text.1:start_kernel (between 'is386' and 'check_x87')
This one is not fixed - yet.
The rest are fixed in latest -linus.
modpost choked over
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x183): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text.1:start_kernel (between 'is386' and 'check_x87')
This one is not fixed - yet.
The rest are fixed in latest -linus.
modpost choked over the
to reproduce this.
process `cat' is using deprecated sysctl (syscall)
net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time; Use
net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time_ms instead.
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #15
timer.
So I think, I will postpone SPARSEMEM until -mm2, as there are seem to
be some problems in that area (Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp
fix)
But maybee I will get SLUB to work. ;)
SLUB works, if I reboot (Alt+SysRq+B) from a 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 kernel.
Otherwise it will panic with IO-APIC
Hi,
I got this compile error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ).
...
net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll':
net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named
'poll_controller'
net/core/netpoll.c:159: error: 'struct
Hi,
I got this error with a randconfig (
http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat )
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ioat_shutdown_functionality':
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed32): undefined reference to `unregister_dca_provider'
ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed3a): undefined
...
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:86: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_status' declared
'static' but never defined
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:87: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_iec958' declared
'static' but never defined
...
Got that with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
