On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 02:47 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > Presumably the new debugging patches in -mm
> > (workqueue-debug-flushing-deadlocks-with-lockdep.patch and
> > workqueue-debug-work-related-deadlocks-with-lockdep.patch) think they have
> > found a potential deadlock in ACPI. I
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 02:47 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Presumably the new debugging patches in -mm
(workqueue-debug-flushing-deadlocks-with-lockdep.patch and
workqueue-debug-work-related-deadlocks-with-lockdep.patch) think they have
found a potential deadlock in ACPI. I don't have
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:48 -0400
> "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>> 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
>> ---
>> kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
>>
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:48 -0400
"Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
> ---
> kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
> (>lock){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
>
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
---
kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
(>lock){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
but task is already holding lock:
(>work){--..}, at: [] run_workqueue+0xa0/0x182
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
---
kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
(ec-lock){--..}, at: [c03031a7] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
but task is already holding lock:
(dpc-work){--..}, at: [c012689d]
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:48 -0400
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
---
kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
(ec-lock){--..}, at: [c03031a7] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:48 -0400
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
---
kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
(ec-lock){--..}, at:
8 matches
Mail list logo
