On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:53:06PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Seeing spinlock bad magic BUG's from x86 and x86_64 test boxes,
> fsx-linux seems to be tickling it. Adding Peter as prop_norm_single
> seems to be his:
Talking to Peter on IRC he suggested I back out the patch below and
retest on
Seeing spinlock bad magic BUG's from x86 and x86_64 test boxes,
fsx-linux seems to be tickling it. Adding Peter as prop_norm_single
seems to be his:
x86 (oai5-hs20):
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, fsx-linux/25600
lock: c3c15a18, .magic: , .owner: /-1, .owner_cpu: 0
[]
Seeing spinlock bad magic BUG's from x86 and x86_64 test boxes,
fsx-linux seems to be tickling it. Adding Peter as prop_norm_single
seems to be his:
x86 (oai5-hs20):
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, fsx-linux/25600
lock: c3c15a18, .magic: , .owner: none/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
[c01e28bc]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:53:06PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Seeing spinlock bad magic BUG's from x86 and x86_64 test boxes,
fsx-linux seems to be tickling it. Adding Peter as prop_norm_single
seems to be his:
Talking to Peter on IRC he suggested I back out the patch below and
retest on
4 matches
Mail list logo