* Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ok, we just found the reason for the 8-way crash, the delta fix
> > > from Peter is below if any of you have tried the previous combo
> > > patch. Updated sched.git as well, new HEAD is
> > > fec13e45305d69fd0bd23b30bd05a0a42cf341f8.
> >
> >
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (t
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:35 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 2:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Feb 12, 2008 2:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass Q
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> > > a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have)
On Feb 12, 2008 12:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> > > a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> > a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
> > that queue of fixes up until today to get it rea
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
> that queue of fixes up until today to get it really correct. Could you
> check:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/p
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.24-git1 is okay
> > > > 2.6.24-git2 is bad
>
> Ok, that's git ID's
>
> b47711bfbcd4eb77ca61ef0162487b2
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > >
> > > 2.6.24-git1 is okay
> > > 2.6.24-git2 is bad
Ok, that's git ID's
b47711bfbcd4eb77ca61ef0162487b20e023ae55 2.6.24-git1
9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a 2.
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
> > out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
> >
> > What happens: Oracle 11g starts
On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
> out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
>
> What happens: Oracle 11g starts up and forks a number of so
> called background processes. Startin
12 matches
Mail list logo
