On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:11:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:46:47 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you(including David:-)) for the confirmation.
> >
> > Andrew: so mm-speed-up-writeback-ramp-up-on-clean-systems.patch is a
> > s
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:46:47 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you(including David:-)) for the confirmation.
>
> Andrew: so mm-speed-up-writeback-ramp-up-on-clean-systems.patch is a
> safe and working patch ;-)
So is anything happening with this patch? It is really necessary
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:26:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:17:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you try with the attached 4 patches? Two of them are expected to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:17:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > Could you try with the attached 4 patches? Two of them are expected to
> > fix your problem, another two are debugging ones(in case the problem
>
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:46:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am seeing something very similar on a PowerPC machine where copying a
> file from an LVM volume with ext3 on it to a simple scsi partition (again
> ext3) on the same disk will hang in congestion_wait. If I am patie
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> Could you try with the attached 4 patches? Two of them are expected to
> fix your problem, another two are debugging ones(in case the problem
> persists).
Applying these four patches fixes it for me. Obviously the reiserfs patch w
Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 06:23:07PM +, David wrote:
>
>> I've attached the output of Sysrq-T to this mail... system is a
>> dual-core AMD64, and files are on a RAID-1 root partition connected two
>> SATA disks on the on-board NVidia controller. I've had no problems
>> be
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 17:46 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:23:07 + David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've been testing rc1 for a week or so, and about 25% of the time I'm
> > seeing Firefox and Thunderbird getting stuck in 'D' state as they startup.
> >
> > I've
[added CC list]
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 06:23:07PM +, David wrote:
> > I've been testing rc1 for a week or so, and about 25% of the time I'm
> > seeing Firefox and Thunderbird getting stuck in 'D' state as they startup.
> >
> > I
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 06:23:07PM +, David wrote:
> I've been testing rc1 for a week or so, and about 25% of the time I'm
> seeing Firefox and Thunderbird getting stuck in 'D' state as they startup.
>
> I've attached the output of Sysrq-T to this mail... system is a
> dual-core AMD64, and fil
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:23:07 + David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been testing rc1 for a week or so, and about 25% of the time I'm
> seeing Firefox and Thunderbird getting stuck in 'D' state as they startup.
>
> I've attached the output of Sysrq-T to this mail... system is a
> dual-core
I've been testing rc1 for a week or so, and about 25% of the time I'm
seeing Firefox and Thunderbird getting stuck in 'D' state as they startup.
I've attached the output of Sysrq-T to this mail... system is a
dual-core AMD64, and files are on a RAID-1 root partition connected two
SATA disks on the
12 matches
Mail list logo
