On Wednesday 28 November 2007 19:43:45 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I guess all architectures except x86 are currently broken because they
> > reference the old sys_timerfd function.
>
> None of them were broken in my testing and I'm unsure why powerpc broke
> here.
PowerPC is unique in that it actual
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:32:07 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > Kernel build fails, with build error
> > >
> > > CC arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.o
> > >
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:32:07 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > Kernel build fails, with build error
> >
> > CC arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.o
> > In file included from arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_cal
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Kernel build fails, with build error
>
> CC arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.o
> In file included from arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c:49:
> include/asm/systbl.h:312: error: ‘sys_timerfd’ undeclared here (not in a
Hi Andrew,
Kernel build fails, with build error
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.o
In file included from arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c:49:
include/asm/systbl.h:312: error: ‘sys_timerfd’ undeclared here (not in a
function)
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/platforms/cell
5 matches
Mail list logo