On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:22:50PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > > > Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
> > > > 'Cached' entry in meminfo rather then getting counted as part of used
> > > > ram.
> > >
> > > Cached is only the page-cache, not all the other caches
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:21:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If that's the case it would seem to be somewhat of a pain to get and
> > kind of out of left field as I'd say most people would expect MemFree to
> > indicate the amount of memory that's no longer freely available
> > (ignoring
Hi
> > > Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
> > > 'Cached' entry in meminfo rather then getting counted as part of used
> > > ram.
> >
> > Cached is only the page-cache, not all the other caches we have..
> > This someones confuses people, but one gets used to it. slabinfo
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 23:14 +1100, CaT wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
> > > > How much memory does:
> > > >
> > > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > >
> > > > gain you?
> > >
> > > 56M used
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
> > > How much memory does:
> > >
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > >
> > > gain you?
> >
> > 56M used now.
>
> Good :-)
Indeed. :)
> > Should all this cache usage not
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
> > > cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
> > > now, about 2 hours after the rsync has well and
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
> > cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
> > now, about 2 hours after the rsync has well and truly finished, the used
> > memory is at 1.23gig. This is
Hi,
On Jan 17, 2008 8:34 AM, CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are 75 processes on the box of which almost 47 are kernel
> processes + init. Of the rest, the top 3 have an RSS of 9.4meg, 6.2meg
> and 4.8meg, 7 are at around 2meg and the rest are below 2meg with the
> majority below 1. So
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
> Not sure where to begin so here goes anway. Today I did an rsync backup
> of a server with 2million+ files. Before doing so the used memory on the
> server this was initiated from was under 200meg (excluding buffers and
> cache). During the rsync
Hi,
On Jan 17, 2008 8:34 AM, CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 75 processes on the box of which almost 47 are kernel
processes + init. Of the rest, the top 3 have an RSS of 9.4meg, 6.2meg
and 4.8meg, 7 are at around 2meg and the rest are below 2meg with the
majority below 1. So unless
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
Not sure where to begin so here goes anway. Today I did an rsync backup
of a server with 2million+ files. Before doing so the used memory on the
server this was initiated from was under 200meg (excluding buffers and
cache). During the rsync the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about 2 hours after the rsync has well and truly finished, the used
memory is at 1.23gig. This is what
Hi
Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
'Cached' entry in meminfo rather then getting counted as part of used
ram.
Cached is only the page-cache, not all the other caches we have..
This someones confuses people, but one gets used to it. slabinfo allows
one to
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 17:34 +1100, CaT wrote:
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about 2 hours after the rsync has well and truly
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
How much memory does:
echo 3 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
gain you?
56M used now.
Good :-)
Indeed. :)
Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 23:14 +1100, CaT wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:40 +1100, CaT wrote:
How much memory does:
echo 3 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
gain you?
56M used now.
Good :-)
Indeed. :)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:21:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
If that's the case it would seem to be somewhat of a pain to get and
kind of out of left field as I'd say most people would expect MemFree to
indicate the amount of memory that's no longer freely available
(ignoring swapping
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:22:50PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
Hi
Should all this cache usage not be counted towards the
'Cached' entry in meminfo rather then getting counted as part of used
ram.
Cached is only the page-cache, not all the other caches we have..
This
Not sure where to begin so here goes anway. Today I did an rsync backup
of a server with 2million+ files. Before doing so the used memory on the
server this was initiated from was under 200meg (excluding buffers and
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about
Not sure where to begin so here goes anway. Today I did an rsync backup
of a server with 2million+ files. Before doing so the used memory on the
server this was initiated from was under 200meg (excluding buffers and
cache). During the rsync the memory used grew to just shy of 1.6gig and
now, about
20 matches
Mail list logo
