Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > > > History: > > > > > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > > History: > > > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. > > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. > > > > Why: Jack

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hi Ingo... back to testing. History: 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-28 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hi Ingo... back to testing. History: 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. Why: Jack keeps printing

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Hi Ingo... back to testing. > History: > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications. > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far. > > Why: Jack keeps printing "delayed..." messages and has xruns which means > that somehow

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun"

Re: 2.6.24-rt1: timing problems (was [git pull] x86/hrtimer/acpi fixes)

2008-01-26 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope, it doesn't still getting delay and xrun messages galore.