On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> > > History:
> > >
> > > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> > History:
> >
> > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
> > 2.6.24-rt1: same so far.
> >
> > Why: Jack
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... back to testing.
History:
2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... back to testing.
History:
2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
2.6.24-rt1: same so far.
Why: Jack keeps printing
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> History:
>
> 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
> 2.6.24-rt1: same so far.
>
> Why: Jack keeps printing "delayed..." messages and has xruns which means
> that somehow
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun"
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it doesn't still getting delay and xrun messages galore.
7 matches
Mail list logo