DHollenbeck wrote:
Where do you see that patch as being applied in the new .y stable series?
Chris
I got that patch description from here:
When you go to http://kernel.org, and click on the stand alone " C " to
the right of 2.6.11.2
It is a hyperlink to:
DHollenbeck wrote:
Where do you see that patch as being applied in the new .y stable series?
Chris
I got that patch description from here:
When you go to http://kernel.org, and click on the stand alone C to
the right of 2.6.11.2
It is a hyperlink to:
Where do you see that patch as being applied in the new .y stable series?
Chris
I got that patch description from here:
When you go to http://kernel.org, and click on the stand alone " C " to
the right of 2.6.11.2
It is a hyperlink to:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/cset/
Have
DHollenbeck wrote:
I had hoped that the proper discipline in rejecting non-critical patches
would have pertained. I remain unconvinced that the .y releases are
anything but noise that should have been kept elsewhere. After reading
through a patch summary, I see this as typical:
* DHollenbeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [PATCH] drivers/net/via-rhine.c: make a variable static const
>
> This patch makes a needlessly global variable static const.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
DHollenbeck wrote:
It's possible I simply don't get it, but the above description of a
patch hardly seems like it would qualify for the intentions of the
2.6.x.y series.
Where do you see that patch as being applied in the new .y stable series?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
I had hoped that the proper discipline in rejecting non-critical patches
would have pertained. I remain unconvinced that the .y releases are
anything but noise that should have been kept elsewhere. After reading
through a patch summary, I see this as typical:
--
I had hoped that the proper discipline in rejecting non-critical patches
would have pertained. I remain unconvinced that the .y releases are
anything but noise that should have been kept elsewhere. After reading
through a patch summary, I see this as typical:
--
* DHollenbeck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[PATCH] drivers/net/via-rhine.c: make a variable static const
This patch makes a needlessly global variable static const.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
DHollenbeck wrote:
It's possible I simply don't get it, but the above description of a
patch hardly seems like it would qualify for the intentions of the
2.6.x.y series.
Where do you see that patch as being applied in the new .y stable series?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
DHollenbeck wrote:
I had hoped that the proper discipline in rejecting non-critical patches
would have pertained. I remain unconvinced that the .y releases are
anything but noise that should have been kept elsewhere. After reading
through a patch summary, I see this as typical:
Where do you see that patch as being applied in the new .y stable series?
Chris
I got that patch description from here:
When you go to http://kernel.org, and click on the stand alone C to
the right of 2.6.11.2
It is a hyperlink to:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/cset/
Have I
12 matches
Mail list logo
