On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 06:15:07PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:25:23AM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > Applies, compiles, and runs smoothly on top of 3.12.6. I'll send word
> > if anything odd shows up.
>
> Tested with various loads, everything nice
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:25:23AM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Applies, compiles, and runs smoothly on top of 3.12.6. I'll send word
> if anything odd shows up.
Tested with various loads, everything nice and working so far.
Have a nice weekend,
Jochen.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:25:23AM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Applies, compiles, and runs smoothly on top of 3.12.6. I'll send word
if anything odd shows up.
Tested with various loads, everything nice and working so far.
Have a nice weekend,
Jochen.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 06:15:07PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:25:23AM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Applies, compiles, and runs smoothly on top of 3.12.6. I'll send word
if anything odd shows up.
Tested with various loads, everything nice and
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:25:23AM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
> [...]
> > And you are quite right, there is a prerequisite commit. I have attached
> >
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
[...]
> And you are quite right, there is a prerequisite commit. I have attached
> both, please apply in numeric order.
Applies, compiles, and runs smoothly on
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
[...]
And you are quite right, there is a prerequisite commit. I have attached
both, please apply in numeric order.
Applies, compiles, and runs smoothly on top of
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:25:23AM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
[...]
And you are quite right, there is a prerequisite commit. I have attached
both, please
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:22:57PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:54:41AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:22:57PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hi again,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:54:41AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hmmm...
Hi again,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:54:41AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
> > [...]
> > > rcu: Kick CPU
Hi again,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:54:41AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
[...]
rcu: Kick CPU halfway to
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
> [...]
> > rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
>
> The stall didn't appear at all since
Hi again,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
[...]
> rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
The stall didn't appear at all since my last email, running 3.12.x
kernels since release. But I will test your
Hi again,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
[...]
rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
The stall didn't appear at all since my last email, running 3.12.x
kernels since release. But I will test your patch
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hi again,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:26:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hmmm... Does the following patch help?
[...]
rcu: Kick CPU halfway to RCU CPU stall warning
The stall didn't appear at all since my last
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:49:31PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > rcu: Reject memory-order-induced stall-warning false positives
> >
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:49:31PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hello again,
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
rcu: Reject memory-order-induced stall-warning false positives
I run
Hello again,
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > rcu: Reject memory-order-induced stall-warning false positives
>
> I run this patch on top of 3.10.11 vanilla since Wednesday, so far
>
Hello again,
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
rcu: Reject memory-order-induced stall-warning false positives
I run this patch on top of 3.10.11 vanilla since Wednesday, so far
without
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
> > warnings on large systems, please see below for the patch.
> [...]
>
Hello again,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
> warnings on large systems, please see below for the patch.
[...]
>
Hello again,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
warnings on large systems, please see below for the patch.
[...]
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hello again,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
warnings on large systems, please see below for the patch.
[...]
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:54:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Their stall was due to old-style creation of sysfs entries for memory.
> Yours might be having a similar issue with the creation of /dev entries,
> so it would be worth trying it.
OK, compiling 3.10.11 with your
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:54:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Their stall was due to old-style creation of sysfs entries for memory.
Yours might be having a similar issue with the creation of /dev entries,
so it would be worth trying it.
OK, compiling 3.10.11 with your
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:45:50AM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > > I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
> > >
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
> > related?
>
> Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
related?
Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:45:50AM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
related?
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 08:48:49PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce that behaviour since.
>
> I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
> related?
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Hi again,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 08:48:49PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce that behaviour since.
I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
related?
Just
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:02:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:32:03PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > just hit this one. Please tell me if you need any more information.
>
> If you wait for a few minutes after the first stall warning message,
> do
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:02:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:32:03PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
just hit this one. Please tell me if you need any more information.
If you wait for a few minutes after the first stall warning message,
do you
34 matches
Mail list logo