On 12/4/2013 6:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Thank you Manuel, but IO think the patch is not complete as we need to
re-enable PNP devices after we make a snapshot to make sure they are
On 2013-12-04 18:16, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Thank you Manuel, but IO think the patch is not complete as we need to
re-enable PNP devices after we make a snapshot to make sure they are
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> >Thank you Manuel, but IO think the patch is not complete as we need to
> >re-enable PNP devices after we make a snapshot to make sure they are
> >working and can handle saving the
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Thank you Manuel, but IO think the patch is not complete as we need to
re-enable PNP devices after we make a snapshot to make sure they are
working and can handle saving the data. Coudl
On 2013-12-04 18:16, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Thank you Manuel, but IO think the patch is not complete as we need to
re-enable PNP devices after we make a snapshot to make sure they are
On 12/4/2013 6:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Thank you Manuel, but IO think the patch is not complete as we need to
re-enable PNP devices after we make a snapshot to make sure they are
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:35:47PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01
On 12/02/2013 12:08 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:44:56AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
I am glad the problem is fixed. But I am puzzled. pnp_bus_resume()
didn't handle restore prior to this change. state doesn't get passed
in to legacy resume routines. I had to add
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:44:56AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 11:35 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
> >On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>>On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
> On
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:35:47PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
> >>>On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
> [
On 12/02/2013 11:35 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input,
linux-serial ]
On
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
> > On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > [ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input,
> > > linux-serial ]
> > >
> > > On 11/26/2013 05:19 PM,
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > [ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input,
> > linux-serial ]
> >
> > On 11/26/2013 05:19 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
> >> Since kernel 3.12.0 I have a problem with
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input,
linux-serial ]
On 11/26/2013 05:19 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
Since kernel 3.12.0 I have a problem with hibernate+resume
not
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input,
linux-serial ]
On 11/26/2013 05:19 PM, Manuel Krause
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input,
linux-serial ]
On
On 12/02/2013 11:35 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:35:47PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01 16:43, Peter Hurley wrote:
[ +cc Dmitry
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:44:56AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/02/2013 11:35 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01
On 12/02/2013 12:08 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:44:56AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
I am glad the problem is fixed. But I am puzzled. pnp_bus_resume()
didn't handle restore prior to this change. state doesn't get passed
in to legacy resume routines. I had to add
On 2013-12-02 20:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:35:47PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-02 17:45, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:38:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, December 02, 2013 05:08:28 PM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2013-12-01
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input, linux-serial ]
On 11/26/2013 05:19 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
Since kernel 3.12.0 I have a problem with hibernate+resume
not reactivating my serial mouse (trackball) with my HP notebook.
Kernels 3.11.0 til 9 don't show this behaviour.
[ +cc Dmitry Torokhov, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-input, linux-serial ]
On 11/26/2013 05:19 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
Since kernel 3.12.0 I have a problem with hibernate+resume
not reactivating my serial mouse (trackball) with my HP notebook.
Kernels 3.11.0 til 9 don't show this behaviour.
If noone is feeling responsible, please, forward this to someone
capable!
Please ask me later for additional information, as I won't post
my full system info to lkml at first.
The module in question may be: serio_raw
Best regards, Manuel Krause
On 2013-11-26 23:19, Manuel Krause wrote:
If noone is feeling responsible, please, forward this to someone
capable!
Please ask me later for additional information, as I won't post
my full system info to lkml at first.
The module in question may be: serio_raw
Best regards, Manuel Krause
On 2013-11-26 23:19, Manuel Krause wrote:
Since kernel 3.12.0 I have a problem with hibernate+resume not
reactivating my serial mouse (trackball) with my HP notebook.
Kernels 3.11.0 til 9 don't show this behaviour.
Machine: HP Notebook with Core2Duo CPU (Penryn)
Distro:openSUSE 12.3, 64bit, continuously updated
Since kernel 3.12.0 I have a problem with hibernate+resume not
reactivating my serial mouse (trackball) with my HP notebook.
Kernels 3.11.0 til 9 don't show this behaviour.
Machine: HP Notebook with Core2Duo CPU (Penryn)
Distro:openSUSE 12.3, 64bit, continuously updated
28 matches
Mail list logo
